THE PRIORITY OF FIELD OVER THEORY IN PRESENTING HELPING THEORY IN IRAN

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BASATIAN SEYYED MOHAMMAD; SALEMI CHAMSARI MORTEZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Social Development and Welfare Planning Year:2013 | Volume:4 | Issue:13 Page(s): 223-250

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

783

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE PRIORITY OF FIELD OVER THEORY IN PRESENTING HELPING THEORY IN IRAN

Author(s)

BASATIAN SEYYED MOHAMMAD | SALEMI CHAMSARI MORTEZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

FIELDWORKSQ2

PARTICIPANT OBSERVATIONQ2

THEORY TESTINGQ3

THEORY BUILDINGQ2

HELPING THEORYQ2

Abstract

Basically, the process of THEORY BUILDING, whether qualitative or quantitative, requires several observations. In the cycle of science production, there is an obvious link between theory and method; i.e.theorization is a result of continuous interaction between observations, explaining them and new observations to explain the former ones. The theories based on FIELDWORKS are to discover and argue the field data which is collected by the researcher who had been present in the field of research. In FIELDWORKS, the researchers are in close contact with the studied phenomenon. If they add participation to their observations and identify themselves with the studied phenomenon, then they will be able to prepare the ground for a deep understanding of it.The methodology of the book Anthropology of Helping3 is indicative of a special scientific style in presentation of findings by the author. To present his findings, the author, as an anthropologist, frequently resorts to comparison and argumentation. He starts with argumentation and then continues with comparison. He uses his basic observations (resulted by living among rural people) for THEORY BUILDING and then, using his subsequent observations (resulted by FIELDWORKS and library studies) he tests the theories. Meanwhile, to make his findings organized and easy to understand, he leaves abstractness and proves them using objective observations. Explanation of abstract concept using objective examples helps the readers to better understand the theoretical findings.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

BASATIAN, SEYYED MOHAMMAD, & SALEMI CHAMSARI, MORTEZA. (2013). THE PRIORITY OF FIELD OVER THEORY IN PRESENTING HELPING THEORY IN IRAN. SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND WELFARE PLANNING, 4(13), 223-250. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/157751/en

Vancouver: Copy

BASATIAN SEYYED MOHAMMAD, SALEMI CHAMSARI MORTEZA. THE PRIORITY OF FIELD OVER THEORY IN PRESENTING HELPING THEORY IN IRAN. SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND WELFARE PLANNING[Internet]. 2013;4(13):223-250. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/157751/en

IEEE: Copy

SEYYED MOHAMMAD BASATIAN, and MORTEZA SALEMI CHAMSARI, “THE PRIORITY OF FIELD OVER THEORY IN PRESENTING HELPING THEORY IN IRAN,” SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND WELFARE PLANNING, vol. 4, no. 13, pp. 223–250, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/157751/en

Related Journal Papers