ART; A LOOK AT THE BEING OF THE OBJECT A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SHKLOVSKY’S AND THE EARLY WITTGENSTEIN'S VIEWS ON ART

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ABEDINIFARD MORTEZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: LITERARY CRITICISM Year:2009 | Volume:2 | Issue:7 Page(s): 79-90

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,657

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

ART; A LOOK AT THE BEING OF THE OBJECT A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SHKLOVSKY’S AND THE EARLY WITTGENSTEIN'S VIEWS ON ART

Author(s)

ABEDINIFARD MORTEZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ARTQ2

LITERARY THEORYQ2

AESTHETICSQ2

ART-OBJECTQ3

CONTEXTQ2

Abstract

The early Wittgenstein believes that the work of ART is an object which is seen sub specie aeternitatis. Thus, it is not seen in the way ordinary things are seen or perceived. In a somewhat similar vein, Victor Shklovsky, the contemporary literary critic and thinker, regarded ART as a way of defamiliarizing the objects and making the familiar unfamiliar. I argue that there is a noticeable similarity and relation between these two aesthetic viewpoints. Both Wittgenstein and Shklovsky considered ART as an opportunity for the audience to experience another type of perception and observation: perceiving objects in themselves and out of their usual CONTEXT. ART separates the object from its ordinary CONTEXT and makes it appear to the subject in a different way and under another perceptual mode. As Shklovsky asserts, the task of ART is to try to free the object from “the automatism of perception” since when the objects are perceived in the usual way, one can use Shklovsky's own words and say that they are actually “reckoned as nothing.” In The this paper, I try to show that the earlier attitude of Wittgenstein toward AESTHETICS and the work of ART is in harmony with the formalistic approach of Shklovsky.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ABEDINIFARD, MORTEZA. (2009). ART; A LOOK AT THE BEING OF THE OBJECT A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SHKLOVSKY’S AND THE EARLY WITTGENSTEIN'S VIEWS ON ART. LITERARY CRITICISM, 2(7), 79-90. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/158257/en

Vancouver: Copy

ABEDINIFARD MORTEZA. ART; A LOOK AT THE BEING OF THE OBJECT A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SHKLOVSKY’S AND THE EARLY WITTGENSTEIN'S VIEWS ON ART. LITERARY CRITICISM[Internet]. 2009;2(7):79-90. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/158257/en

IEEE: Copy

MORTEZA ABEDINIFARD, “ART; A LOOK AT THE BEING OF THE OBJECT A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SHKLOVSKY’S AND THE EARLY WITTGENSTEIN'S VIEWS ON ART,” LITERARY CRITICISM, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 79–90, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/158257/en

Related Journal Papers