CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN EFL CLASSROOMS: LEARNER NEGOTIATION STRATEGIES AND UPTAKE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GHAFAR SAMAR R.; SHAYESTEHFAR P.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning Year:2010 | Volume:52 | Issue:212 Page(s): 107-134

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

661

Download:

472

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN EFL CLASSROOMS: LEARNER NEGOTIATION STRATEGIES AND UPTAKE

Author(s)

GHAFAR SAMAR R. | SHAYESTEHFAR P. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CORRECTIVE FEEDBACKQ3

COMMUNICATION STRATEGIESQ3

INCIDENTAL FOCUS-ON-FORMQ3

FORM-FOCUSED INSTRUCTIONQ3

UPTAKEQ3

Abstract

This quasi-experimental study examines the extent to which research findings from teacher CORRECTIVE FEEDBACKs (CFs) and SLA concerning the efficiency of Focus-on-Form (FoF) pedagogy is transferable to the context of foreign language learning in Iranian schools. To investigate how "grammar instruction with FoF-oriented error treatment" functions as a matrix in which English learning takes place, transcripts of learners' interactions in two communicatively based high school classes were analyzed using Lyster & Ranta's taxonomy of CFs moves (Experimental Group (EXG) received CFs but provision of CFs in Control Group (CG) was not aimed). Findings reveal that all six types of CFs defined in literature were enjoyed by the present EFL teacher with a tendency to use "metalinguistic" or the overall "student-generated repairs" more than "recasts". The frequency and distribution of EFL teacher’s CF types together with the frequency and distribution of different types of learner UPTAKE following each CF type are discussed. The results highlight the endorsement of FoF pedagogy in EFL contexts and bring to light the efficacy of teacher CFs on the learner UPTAKE. The study is unique as it adds an important layer to teacher CF and SLA research by further accounting for differences between EXG and CG in terms of negotiation strategies.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

GHAFAR SAMAR, R., & SHAYESTEHFAR, P.. (2010). CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN EFL CLASSROOMS: LEARNER NEGOTIATION STRATEGIES AND UPTAKE. JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING AND LEARNING, 52(212), 107-134. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/160436/en

Vancouver: Copy

GHAFAR SAMAR R., SHAYESTEHFAR P.. CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN EFL CLASSROOMS: LEARNER NEGOTIATION STRATEGIES AND UPTAKE. JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING AND LEARNING[Internet]. 2010;52(212):107-134. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/160436/en

IEEE: Copy

R. GHAFAR SAMAR, and P. SHAYESTEHFAR, “CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN EFL CLASSROOMS: LEARNER NEGOTIATION STRATEGIES AND UPTAKE,” JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING AND LEARNING, vol. 52, no. 212, pp. 107–134, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/160436/en

Related Journal Papers