IRAQ'S OCCUPATION (2003-2011) FROM THEORIES OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS POINT OF VIEW: OBJECTIVE RATIONALISM VERSUS FEMINIST HUMANISM

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MAZAHERI MOHAMMAD MEHDI; MOLAEE AZAM

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: FOREIGN RELATIONS Year:2013 | Volume:4 | Issue:4 (16) Page(s): 169-196

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,852

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

IRAQ'S OCCUPATION (2003-2011) FROM THEORIES OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS POINT OF VIEW: OBJECTIVE RATIONALISM VERSUS FEMINIST HUMANISM

Author(s)

MAZAHERI MOHAMMAD MEHDI | MOLAEE AZAM | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

FEMINISMQ2

BALANCE OF POWERQ1

INSIDE/OUTSIDE VIEWQ2

VIABLE STATEQ2

Abstract

Following the U.S.-led coalition military attack against Iraq in 2003, a series of violence, ethnic-religious clashes and terrorist actions have taken place in this country. This article tries to study the consequences of Iraq's war using theories of realism and FEMINISM. It aims to find how these theories explain the consequences of Iraq's occupation and which one can give a better explanation in this regard. The authors after studying vies related to both theories, concluded that realistic approach enjoys a higher explanatory power in areas such as "rationalism" (benefit and cost), "regional BALANCE OF POWER" after occupation and "the U.S. power and interests" in Iraq's war. Also, FEMINISM relying upon its own "ontology" and "methodology" centers on the role of individuals and ethnic-religious groups as well as subjects like "gender" and " mortality". Therefore, it can explain those consequences of Iraq's war which have been neglected by realists.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

MAZAHERI, MOHAMMAD MEHDI, & MOLAEE, AZAM. (2013). IRAQ'S OCCUPATION (2003-2011) FROM THEORIES OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS POINT OF VIEW: OBJECTIVE RATIONALISM VERSUS FEMINIST HUMANISM. FOREIGN RELATIONS, 4(4 (16)), 169-196. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/166986/en

Vancouver: Copy

MAZAHERI MOHAMMAD MEHDI, MOLAEE AZAM. IRAQ'S OCCUPATION (2003-2011) FROM THEORIES OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS POINT OF VIEW: OBJECTIVE RATIONALISM VERSUS FEMINIST HUMANISM. FOREIGN RELATIONS[Internet]. 2013;4(4 (16)):169-196. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/166986/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD MEHDI MAZAHERI, and AZAM MOLAEE, “IRAQ'S OCCUPATION (2003-2011) FROM THEORIES OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS POINT OF VIEW: OBJECTIVE RATIONALISM VERSUS FEMINIST HUMANISM,” FOREIGN RELATIONS, vol. 4, no. 4 (16), pp. 169–196, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/166986/en

Related Journal Papers