MAKING COMPARISON BETWEEN FUZZY AND NON-FUZZY MCDM TO CALCULATE WEIGHT FACTORS OF PROJECT ACTIVITIES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GOLPIRA HERESH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Year:2012 | Volume:7 | Issue:20 Page(s): 23-33

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,991

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

MAKING COMPARISON BETWEEN FUZZY AND NON-FUZZY MCDM TO CALCULATE WEIGHT FACTORS OF PROJECT ACTIVITIES

Author(s)

GOLPIRA HERESH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PROJECT SUCCESSQ2

MCDMQ2

S-CURVEQ2

WEIGHT FACTORSQ2

Abstract

This paper combines a group analytic hierarchy process (GAHP) and technique of order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) in fuzzy or non-fuzzy form to define project activities WEIGHT FACTORS. A project with 121 activities is proposed as a case and critical parameters which are affecting the priority of each activity are recognized and weighted by GAHP in its fuzzy or non-fuzzy forms. These weights are subsequently used as the inputs for TOPSIS in its fuzzy or non-fuzzy forms to define the project activities weights. The weights are assigned to the activities and the S-CURVEs of the two new fuzzy and non-fuzzy methods are drawn to compare with the two accepted traditional ones – Bill of quantity (BOQ) and Milestones methods. Finally, analyze of variance method is used for mathematical comparing of the methods. The results are shown that the two new methods are valid and the non-fuzzy one is better than the fuzzy one.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

GOLPIRA, HERESH. (2012). MAKING COMPARISON BETWEEN FUZZY AND NON-FUZZY MCDM TO CALCULATE WEIGHT FACTORS OF PROJECT ACTIVITIES. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT, 7(20), 23-33. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/171164/en

Vancouver: Copy

GOLPIRA HERESH. MAKING COMPARISON BETWEEN FUZZY AND NON-FUZZY MCDM TO CALCULATE WEIGHT FACTORS OF PROJECT ACTIVITIES. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT[Internet]. 2012;7(20):23-33. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/171164/en

IEEE: Copy

HERESH GOLPIRA, “MAKING COMPARISON BETWEEN FUZZY AND NON-FUZZY MCDM TO CALCULATE WEIGHT FACTORS OF PROJECT ACTIVITIES,” JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT, vol. 7, no. 20, pp. 23–33, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/171164/en

Related Journal Papers