مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

797
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

AN ANALYSIS OF ISRAEL'S APPROACH VIS-A-VIS THE 5+1 NEGOTIATIONS WITH IRAN WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF GAMES THEORY

Pages

  29-63

Keywords

5+1 NEGOTIATIONQ2

Abstract

 Diplomacy as a subject area in international relations has been the object of analysis by game theory theorist. From the view point of these theorists in the simplest form of diplomacy between countries it is assumed that there are two governments. One of them gives suggestion and the other one has several options before it. One accepts the offered suggestion; the other suggests a mutual option or disrupts the negotiation. If the second party puts forward mutual suggestion option, the first government faces a similar scenario which mentioned above. This process eventually ends with acceptance of one option or disrupting the whole game. One of the basic factors in choosing among different options is the expecting value of the gain which a government guesses can get from the option before her taking into consideration the passage of time. Taking into view the above principle, the negotiations of the Islamic Republic of IRAN with 5+1 have gone through ups and downs. Both the parties for reaching a common solution and taking further steps have gone through a lengthy path. Meanwhile different actors with their own interest in mind have tried to follow and accompany the negotiating parties. Among these actors ISRAEL has tried its best to weaken IRAN’s position in negotiations process. From the view point of the authorities of ISRAEL regime conclusion of any agreement which recognizes IRAN’s right to enrichment is not good news for ISRAEL. The inherent suspicion and distrust of IRAN does not allow ISRAEL to wish success for such agreement. But on the other hand ISRAEL fears her isolation and she is compelled to accept such agreement. The present article wants to answer this question that from ISRAEL view point what feature ideal final result of 5+1 and IRAN negotiation has and what activities ISRAEL have done to bring about that ideal model. In this direction the paper has tried to analyze the problem within the framework of game theory with zero-sum result. The cost which both parties i.e. IRAN (player A) and ISRAEL (player B) pay (in terms of policies which they pursue) between 2007 and 2012 have evaluated and analyzed.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    FARAJIRAD, ABDOLREZA, & NAJAFLOU TORKAMAN, MAJID. (2014). AN ANALYSIS OF ISRAEL'S APPROACH VIS-A-VIS THE 5+1 NEGOTIATIONS WITH IRAN WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF GAMES THEORY. POLITICAL AND INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 6(19), 29-63. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/172805/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    FARAJIRAD ABDOLREZA, NAJAFLOU TORKAMAN MAJID. AN ANALYSIS OF ISRAEL'S APPROACH VIS-A-VIS THE 5+1 NEGOTIATIONS WITH IRAN WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF GAMES THEORY. POLITICAL AND INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND RESEARCH QUARTERLY[Internet]. 2014;6(19):29-63. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/172805/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ABDOLREZA FARAJIRAD, and MAJID NAJAFLOU TORKAMAN, “AN ANALYSIS OF ISRAEL'S APPROACH VIS-A-VIS THE 5+1 NEGOTIATIONS WITH IRAN WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF GAMES THEORY,” POLITICAL AND INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND RESEARCH QUARTERLY, vol. 6, no. 19, pp. 29–63, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/172805/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button