مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,584
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

IN-GROUP AND OUT-GROUP CRITICISM (BAHAR AND EGHBAL- BAHAR AND RAFAT)

Pages

  77-96

Abstract

 In this research two kinds of critical approaches are introduced and then some examples of these two approaches are selected and discussed. The aim of this article is to consider the critical fields in Constitution period in Iran, which is counted as the turning point in passing from tradition to modernity. The first approach, IN-GROUP CRITICISM, is criticism among the members of one group; the second approach, OUT-GROUP CRITICISM, is done among the members of two different groups. The example selected for the first approach refers to the “Association of the Faculty” and its two members Mohammad TaghiBahar and Abbas Eghbal Ashtiani, who stand for Neoclassicism. The second example refers to the “Association of the Faculty” and BAHAR in particular and TAJADDOD-E TABRIZ JOURNAL and Taghi Rafat at its heads. The latter group represents revolutionary Romanticism. The method of this research is based on textual analysis. The analysis of the content of these two approaches shows that the in-group approach in Constitution period was more moderate compared to the out-group approach and sometimes personal prejudices had a role in the process of criticism. There has been difference in taste in the first approach, and in the second approach the difference is in thought and ideas. If approaches like these could have changed into movements, they could have been useful in criticism of literature and also in widening the field of criticism. These two approaches, however, had been stopped gradually. Moreover, OUT-GROUP CRITICISM is considered as the opposition of Neoclassicism and Romanticism in Iran.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    ABBASI, HABIB ALLAH, & GHAFFARPOUR SEDIGHI, NAIMEH. (2013). IN-GROUP AND OUT-GROUP CRITICISM (BAHAR AND EGHBAL- BAHAR AND RAFAT). PERSIAN LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES), 21(75 (20)), 77-96. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/173422/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    ABBASI HABIB ALLAH, GHAFFARPOUR SEDIGHI NAIMEH. IN-GROUP AND OUT-GROUP CRITICISM (BAHAR AND EGHBAL- BAHAR AND RAFAT). PERSIAN LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES)[Internet]. 2013;21(75 (20)):77-96. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/173422/en

    IEEE: Copy

    HABIB ALLAH ABBASI, and NAIMEH GHAFFARPOUR SEDIGHI, “IN-GROUP AND OUT-GROUP CRITICISM (BAHAR AND EGHBAL- BAHAR AND RAFAT),” PERSIAN LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE (JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES), vol. 21, no. 75 (20), pp. 77–96, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/173422/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button