مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

432
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Farrokhi or Mokhtā ri? Completion, Adaptation or Plagiarism? (Exploring the Identity of the Real Author of Shahriā r-nā ma and Describing the Relation between the First and Second Versions)

Pages

  207-235

Abstract

 Shahriā r-nā ma is one of the most remarkable Persian epics. In spite of many years of research in this regard, still there are fundamental ambiguities about it: the attribute of the work to some other famous poets, speculations about the exact time of its compilation from the sixth to the twelfth century (the end of Safavid dynasty), a hypothesis of the two long parts and a long and short pieces that the second part of the Shahriā r-nā ma was the a continuation of the first part. In this research, these theories are discussed and criticized. In this essay, for the first time, all four Manuscripts of the Shahriā r-nā ma were carefully studied. According to the content of the work and other woks, it became clear that the main poet of Shahriā r-nā ma, named Farrokhi, lived in the ninth or tenth century or even some centuries earlier, who donated his to a king called Mahmoudshah. Some unknown events have caused, after the death of Farrokhi, another poet seemed to be called Mokhtā ri, assumed the book. Making the work smaller, making slight or big changes in lexicon, syntax and images of the verses, and shortening the text, Mokhtā ri plagiarized and reversified the work. He assumed the book and present it as a new work to the son of previous king, called Masoud.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    GHAEMI, FARZAD. (2018). Farrokhi or Mokhtā ri? Completion, Adaptation or Plagiarism? (Exploring the Identity of the Real Author of Shahriā r-nā ma and Describing the Relation between the First and Second Versions). NEW LITERARY STUDIES, 51(1 (200) ), 207-235. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/185494/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    GHAEMI FARZAD. Farrokhi or Mokhtā ri? Completion, Adaptation or Plagiarism? (Exploring the Identity of the Real Author of Shahriā r-nā ma and Describing the Relation between the First and Second Versions). NEW LITERARY STUDIES[Internet]. 2018;51(1 (200) ):207-235. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/185494/en

    IEEE: Copy

    FARZAD GHAEMI, “Farrokhi or Mokhtā ri? Completion, Adaptation or Plagiarism? (Exploring the Identity of the Real Author of Shahriā r-nā ma and Describing the Relation between the First and Second Versions),” NEW LITERARY STUDIES, vol. 51, no. 1 (200) , pp. 207–235, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/185494/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button