COMPARISON OF SKEPTICAL INTERPRETATION WITH NATURALISTIC INTERPRETATION OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF HUME

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MURVARID H.; HAQQI ALI

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

965

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF SKEPTICAL INTERPRETATION WITH NATURALISTIC INTERPRETATION OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF HUME

Author(s)

MURVARID H. | HAQQI ALI | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PHILOSOPHY OF HUMEQ3

EMPIRICISMQ2

SKEPTICISMQ2

NATURALISMQ2

FUNDAMENTAL BELIEFSQ3

Abstract

Was Hume really a skeptic empiricist? The common picture that existed about Hume sometime ago outlined him as an empiricist who, contrary to his preceding empiricists, could deduce SKEPTICISM which was a corollary of EMPIRICISM from it. According to this interpretation, Hume's entire project is negation and rejection of metaphysical knowledge as well as a science based on principles of EMPIRICISM. However, in the first half of twentieth century, David Camp Smith presented a more positive interpretation of Hume. According to his interpretation, Hume's objective is not entirely negating and rejecting; rather, his prime purpose is to indicate that man's FUNDAMENTAL BELIEFS, which according to the principles of EMPIRICISM are not adoptable from experience or intellect, are originated from human nature, and, somehow, the nature imposes them on us. This analysis by Smith transforms Hume from a skeptic empiricist into a naturalist philosopher. The present paper seeks to make a brief comparison between these two interpretations on Hume.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MURVARID, H., & HAQQI, ALI. (2009). COMPARISON OF SKEPTICAL INTERPRETATION WITH NATURALISTIC INTERPRETATION OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF HUME. ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHY & THEOLOGY (ISLAMIC STUDIES (KALAM)), -(82/2), 177-202. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/185796/en

Vancouver: Copy

MURVARID H., HAQQI ALI. COMPARISON OF SKEPTICAL INTERPRETATION WITH NATURALISTIC INTERPRETATION OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF HUME. ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHY & THEOLOGY (ISLAMIC STUDIES (KALAM))[Internet]. 2009;-(82/2):177-202. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/185796/en

IEEE: Copy

H. MURVARID, and ALI HAQQI, “COMPARISON OF SKEPTICAL INTERPRETATION WITH NATURALISTIC INTERPRETATION OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF HUME,” ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHY & THEOLOGY (ISLAMIC STUDIES (KALAM)), vol. -, no. 82/2, pp. 177–202, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/185796/en

Related Journal Papers