DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE APPROACH OF ARISTOTLE AND AVICENNA IN PROOF OF THE EXISTENCE OF GOD

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SALEH TAYEBNIA M.; AKBARIAN R.; SAEEDIMEHR M.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Comparative Theology Year:2012 | Volume:3 | Issue:7 Page(s): 1-18

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,203

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE APPROACH OF ARISTOTLE AND AVICENNA IN PROOF OF THE EXISTENCE OF GOD

Author(s)

SALEH TAYEBNIA M. | AKBARIAN R. | SAEEDIMEHR M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ARISTOTLEQ2

AVICENNAQ2

A PRIORIQ2

POSTERIORIQ3

ONTOLOGICALQ2

COSMOLOGICALQ2

Abstract

Comparing between approach of ARISTOTLE and AVICENNA in proof of the existence of God, is a sign of basic difference between Peripatetic idea of ARISTOTLE and AVICENNA, also the different way that has been gone in the Muslim world compared to the west, in proof of the existence of God. ARISTOTLE in “On Philosophies”, has been mentioned to the two arguments: "degrees of perfection argument" and "teleological argument", but his main argument on the existence of God, is “the argument from motion” that has explained details of it in the Lambda Book of Metaphysics and Physics. Each of the three above arguments has a COSMOLOGICAL approach and is categorized as the POSTERIORI arguments. For AVICENNA, acceptance of that ARISTOTLE had wanted to prove the existence of God by natural things, such as world motion, is very hard.According to this thinking, he focused all his efforts on not using the COSMOLOGICAL arguments to prove the existence of God. AVICENNA used “the proof of middle and the end” and “the proof from contingency and necessity ”in several of his books and his latest exposition of the proof from contingency and necessity has named “proof of the truthful”. His argument is ONTOLOGICAL and priori too.

Cites

No record.

References

برخی دیدگاههای جدید در باب معرفت پیشینی

Cite

APA: Copy

SALEH TAYEBNIA, M., AKBARIAN, R., & SAEEDIMEHR, M.. (2012). DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE APPROACH OF ARISTOTLE AND AVICENNA IN PROOF OF THE EXISTENCE OF GOD. COMPARATIVE THEOLOGY, 3(7), 1-18. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/191878/en

Vancouver: Copy

SALEH TAYEBNIA M., AKBARIAN R., SAEEDIMEHR M.. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE APPROACH OF ARISTOTLE AND AVICENNA IN PROOF OF THE EXISTENCE OF GOD. COMPARATIVE THEOLOGY[Internet]. 2012;3(7):1-18. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/191878/en

IEEE: Copy

M. SALEH TAYEBNIA, R. AKBARIAN, and M. SAEEDIMEHR, “DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE APPROACH OF ARISTOTLE AND AVICENNA IN PROOF OF THE EXISTENCE OF GOD,” COMPARATIVE THEOLOGY, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 1–18, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/191878/en

Related Journal Papers