مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

658
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

RECONSTRUCTING THEORIES OF “PROPOSITION” AND “STATE OF AFFAIRS” ON THE BASIS OF THE IDEAS OF JOHN POLLOCK

Pages

  31-52

Abstract

 Our main aim in this article is to analyze the two CONCEPTs “PROPOSITION” and “state of affairs”. First we present the minimal expectations of a theory of “PROPOSITION” and a theory of “state of affairs”, and then we turn to the views of the contemporary theorist JOHN POLLOCK regarding these two topics and present the most important of his views on the subject. Subsequently, we reconstruct a theory of “PROPOSITION” and a theory of “state of affairs” on the basis of Pollock's ideas. According to this reconstructed theory, “PROPOSITIONs” and “states of affairs” are necessary mind-independent entities such that the senses of “logical OPERATORs”, “concepts” and “designators” can be their constituents. These constituents, by being arranged in a particular logical form, form PROPOSITIONs or states of affairs. There is no ontological difference between a PROPOSITION and a STATE OF AFFAIRS, but rather they only differ in their logical forms. At the end of the article we evaluate the power of our theory in satisfying the minimal expectations for a theory of “PROPOSITIONs” and “states of affairs”.

Cites

References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    ALI HOJJATI, SEYYED MUHAMMAD, AMIRKHANLU, MOJTABA, & NABAVI, LOTFOLLAH. (2012). RECONSTRUCTING THEORIES OF “PROPOSITION” AND “STATE OF AFFAIRS” ON THE BASIS OF THE IDEAS OF JOHN POLLOCK. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), 44(2), 31-52. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/198322/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    ALI HOJJATI SEYYED MUHAMMAD, AMIRKHANLU MOJTABA, NABAVI LOTFOLLAH. RECONSTRUCTING THEORIES OF “PROPOSITION” AND “STATE OF AFFAIRS” ON THE BASIS OF THE IDEAS OF JOHN POLLOCK. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA)[Internet]. 2012;44(2):31-52. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/198322/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SEYYED MUHAMMAD ALI HOJJATI, MOJTABA AMIRKHANLU, and LOTFOLLAH NABAVI, “RECONSTRUCTING THEORIES OF “PROPOSITION” AND “STATE OF AFFAIRS” ON THE BASIS OF THE IDEAS OF JOHN POLLOCK,” FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 31–52, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/198322/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button