MULLA SADRA ON THE LOGICAL PROBLEMS OF THE NEGATIONS OF “THE MOST INCLUSIVE CONCEPTS”

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ATASHIN SADAF MOHAMMAD REZA; HOJJATI SEYYED MOHAMMAD ALI

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Philosophy and Kalam Year:2010 | Volume:43 | Issue:1 Page(s): 11-27

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,326

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

MULLA SADRA ON THE LOGICAL PROBLEMS OF THE NEGATIONS OF “THE MOST INCLUSIVE CONCEPTS”

Author(s)

ATASHIN SADAF MOHAMMAD REZA | HOJJATI SEYYED MOHAMMAD ALI | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EQUALITY RELATIONQ3

ABSOLUTE-SPECIFIC RELATIONQ3

NEGATIVE PROPOSITIONQ3

AFFIRMATIVE EQUIPOLLENT PROPOSITIONQ3

NON-CONCLUSIVE PROPOSITIONQ3

Abstract

According to the rules of quadruplet relations between concepts, Muslim logicians have proved that relation between the negations of two concepts which are equal (Musawi) or absolute-general-andspecific (‘Amm wa Kaass-e Mutlaq) are, respectively, equal and absolute-specific-and-general; but these rules come across some problems when the most inclusive concepts are involved, since the negation of them are empty concepts. The argument for establishing these rules becomes invalid. The source of this invalidity is that the truth condition of negation proposition is different from AFFIRMATIVE EQUIPOLLENT PROPOSITION. However, it seems, none of the solutions, presented by Muslim logicians, are convincer except that of Mulla Sadra. He presents a proper interpretation of that difference, and by using NON-CONCLUSIVE PROPOSITION he succeeds in solving the problems.

Cites

No record.

References

قاعده فرعیه و ثبوت الثابت

Cite

APA: Copy

ATASHIN SADAF, MOHAMMAD REZA, & HOJJATI, SEYYED MOHAMMAD ALI. (2010). MULLA SADRA ON THE LOGICAL PROBLEMS OF THE NEGATIONS OF “THE MOST INCLUSIVE CONCEPTS”. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), 43(1), 11-27. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/198338/en

Vancouver: Copy

ATASHIN SADAF MOHAMMAD REZA, HOJJATI SEYYED MOHAMMAD ALI. MULLA SADRA ON THE LOGICAL PROBLEMS OF THE NEGATIONS OF “THE MOST INCLUSIVE CONCEPTS”. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA)[Internet]. 2010;43(1):11-27. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/198338/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD REZA ATASHIN SADAF, and SEYYED MOHAMMAD ALI HOJJATI, “MULLA SADRA ON THE LOGICAL PROBLEMS OF THE NEGATIONS OF “THE MOST INCLUSIVE CONCEPTS”,” FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 11–27, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/198338/en

Related Journal Papers