THE MULLA SADRA’S DISTINCT SOLUTION FROM IBN SINA’S ON RESOLVING CO-EXISTENCE OF TWO CATEGORIES IN MENTAL EXISTENCE AND ITS EFFICIENCY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ZERAATPISHEH MAHMOUD; QARAMALEKI AHAD FARAMARZ

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Philosophy and Kalam Year:2013 | Volume:46 | Issue:1 Page(s): 79-91

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

750

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE MULLA SADRA’S DISTINCT SOLUTION FROM IBN SINA’S ON RESOLVING CO-EXISTENCE OF TWO CATEGORIES IN MENTAL EXISTENCE AND ITS EFFICIENCY

Author(s)

ZERAATPISHEH MAHMOUD | QARAMALEKI AHAD FARAMARZ | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PRIMARY SUBSISTENCEQ2

SECONDARY SUBSISTENCEQ2

UNIVERSAL SUBSTANCEQ2

ESSENTIAL PRIMARY PREDICATIONQ2

ARTIFICIAL COMMON PREDICATIONQ2

Abstract

Although Aristotle has considered the “universal substance” as a substance, he introduced knowledge as an accident. The question then arises as to whether a “universal substance”, whereas it is a substance, can be an accident. Answering the question, Ibn Sina has changed the subject of the dispute from “mental substance” to “quiddity of substance”, so that he could guarantee its truth in the form of an “essential ARTIFICIAL COMMON PREDICATION” (haml shaye sana’i be-al-dhdhat). Considering this change and criticizing Ibn Sina, Mulla Sadra has posed “essential primary predication” (haml awwali dhdhati) as a solution. By considering these two solutions, the necessity of posing ESSENTIAL PRIMARY PREDICATION by Sadra can be understood. It also can be well realized that their solutions, despite Qawam Safari’s claim, are not the same, and Sadra’s solution cannot be seen as inefficient, as Fallahi says, although it can only solves some part of the problem.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ZERAATPISHEH, MAHMOUD, & QARAMALEKI, AHAD FARAMARZ. (2013). THE MULLA SADRA’S DISTINCT SOLUTION FROM IBN SINA’S ON RESOLVING CO-EXISTENCE OF TWO CATEGORIES IN MENTAL EXISTENCE AND ITS EFFICIENCY. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), 46(1), 79-91. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/198350/en

Vancouver: Copy

ZERAATPISHEH MAHMOUD, QARAMALEKI AHAD FARAMARZ. THE MULLA SADRA’S DISTINCT SOLUTION FROM IBN SINA’S ON RESOLVING CO-EXISTENCE OF TWO CATEGORIES IN MENTAL EXISTENCE AND ITS EFFICIENCY. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA)[Internet]. 2013;46(1):79-91. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/198350/en

IEEE: Copy

MAHMOUD ZERAATPISHEH, and AHAD FARAMARZ QARAMALEKI, “THE MULLA SADRA’S DISTINCT SOLUTION FROM IBN SINA’S ON RESOLVING CO-EXISTENCE OF TWO CATEGORIES IN MENTAL EXISTENCE AND ITS EFFICIENCY,” FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 79–91, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/198350/en

Related Journal Papers