A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE KHAJEH NASIR’S VIEWPOINT ON HOW EQUIVOCAL TYPES REFER TO THEIR TOKENS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ALAMOLHODA SEYYED ALI

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Philosophy and Kalam Year:2016 | Volume:49 | Issue:1 Page(s): 97-114

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

522

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE KHAJEH NASIR’S VIEWPOINT ON HOW EQUIVOCAL TYPES REFER TO THEIR TOKENS

Author(s)

ALAMOLHODA SEYYED ALI | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

KHAJEH NASIRQ2

UNIVOCAL TYPESQ1

PERIPATETIC SCHOOLQ2

AVICENNAQ2

Abstract

In this paper, through exploring the problem of equivocal types and its historical roots in Islamic PERIPATETIC SCHOOL, we will explain the differences between KHAJEH NASIR’s approach to equivocal types and AVICENNA’s one; and show that such differences result from Sohrevardi’s criticisms and his belief in the priority of essence.On the one hand, KHAJEH NASIR embraces Sohrevardi’s criticism of AVICENNA, and on the other, he never could accommodate modulation and gradation of essence in the framework of PERIPATETIC SCHOOL. Thus, he considers the equivocal types as required common accidental of their tokens. In this paper, it has been shown that, firstly, KHAJEH NASIR borrows this idea from the matter of the relation of genus and differentia and of accident and Aristotle’s accidental categories. Secondly, to embrace such idea epistemologically results in inconformity between subject and object form Peripatetic point of view. Furthermore, from theological point of view, it paves the way to Ibn Kamooneh’s doubt.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ALAMOLHODA, SEYYED ALI. (2016). A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE KHAJEH NASIR’S VIEWPOINT ON HOW EQUIVOCAL TYPES REFER TO THEIR TOKENS. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), 49(1 ), 97-114. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/198397/en

Vancouver: Copy

ALAMOLHODA SEYYED ALI. A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE KHAJEH NASIR’S VIEWPOINT ON HOW EQUIVOCAL TYPES REFER TO THEIR TOKENS. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA)[Internet]. 2016;49(1 ):97-114. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/198397/en

IEEE: Copy

SEYYED ALI ALAMOLHODA, “A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE KHAJEH NASIR’S VIEWPOINT ON HOW EQUIVOCAL TYPES REFER TO THEIR TOKENS,” FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), vol. 49, no. 1 , pp. 97–114, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/198397/en

Related Journal Papers