THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PRINCIPLE OF ISTIṢḤĀB AND DARʼ RULE IN IRANIAN ISLAMIC PENAL CODE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

RAHIMINEJAD ESMAEIL

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law Year:2017 | Volume:50 | Issue:1 Page(s): 77-86

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

3,987

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PRINCIPLE OF ISTIṢḤĀB AND DARʼ RULE IN IRANIAN ISLAMIC PENAL CODE

Author(s)

RAHIMINEJAD ESMAEIL | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ISTISHĀB PRINCIPLEQ1

CONFLICTQ2

RESOLUTIONQ1

DARʼRULEQ1

IRANIAN ISLAMIC PENAL CODEQ1

Abstract

Iranian Legislature has recognized the rule of darʼ (not enforcing punishments (ḥudūd) in cases of doubt) in articles 120, 121 of the Islamic penal code (1392) and has removed any criminality, responsibility and punishment due to this rule in doubtful cases. However, the legislature in other articles of this code, especially the articles 307, 308, 311, 114 ,115 has passed regulations on the basis of istiṣḥāb principle (legal presumption of continuity of the status quo in doubtful cases), some of which contrast with the necessities of darʼ rule, such as considering the crime intentional at the time of doubt about the perpetrator’s not having free will while committing the crime, providing retaliation for the perpetrator at the time of doubt about his insanity while committing the crime and considering the criminal entitled to punishment at the time of doubt about his repentance before the crime is proved. This article analyses these contradictory regulations and their RESOLUTIONs.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

RAHIMINEJAD, ESMAEIL. (2017). THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PRINCIPLE OF ISTI???B AND DAR? RULE IN IRANIAN ISLAMIC PENAL CODE. FEQH VA MABANI-YE HOQUQ-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR JURISPRUDENCE & ESSENTIALS OF THE ISLAMIC LAW) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), 50(1 ), 77-86. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/198503/en

Vancouver: Copy

RAHIMINEJAD ESMAEIL. THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PRINCIPLE OF ISTI???B AND DAR? RULE IN IRANIAN ISLAMIC PENAL CODE. FEQH VA MABANI-YE HOQUQ-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR JURISPRUDENCE & ESSENTIALS OF THE ISLAMIC LAW) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA)[Internet]. 2017;50(1 ):77-86. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/198503/en

IEEE: Copy

ESMAEIL RAHIMINEJAD, “THE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PRINCIPLE OF ISTI???B AND DAR? RULE IN IRANIAN ISLAMIC PENAL CODE,” FEQH VA MABANI-YE HOQUQ-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR JURISPRUDENCE & ESSENTIALS OF THE ISLAMIC LAW) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), vol. 50, no. 1 , pp. 77–86, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/198503/en

Related Journal Papers