CRITERIA FOR DISTINGUISHING JUDGMENT FROM RIGHT IN LEGAL THEORIES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HOSSEINI SEYYED ABDOLRAHIM

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law Year:2017 | Volume:50 | Issue:1 Page(s): 57-76

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,453

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CRITERIA FOR DISTINGUISHING JUDGMENT FROM RIGHT IN LEGAL THEORIES

Author(s)

HOSSEINI SEYYED ABDOLRAHIM | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

WRONGQ2

ORIGINALITY OF JUDGMENTQ1

PROPORTIONALITYQ1

RIGHTQ2

JUDGMENTQ2

NON-RIGHTFULNESSQ1

CAUSALITYQ2

Abstract

The issue of confusion between RIGHTs and JUDGMENTs and the ways out of this challenge and contrast are the fundamental debates in the field of law and jurisprudence and sometimes other fields of human sciences such as ethics and politics. Identifying and argument about the principles and general regulations and rulings in this case, such as rules and regulations in inference in WRONG cases between RIGHT and law and determination and distinctions is faced with various viewpoints and comments, from among which five theories have been considered important. Principality of JUDGMENT, the theory of NON-RIGHTFULNESS, theory of reference to the appearance of texts, detailed theory, and PROPORTIONALITY between the sentence and the subject theory. Since the main fundamental problem and challenge in this issue is the non-attention of the learned scholars to the criteria and capabilities of RIGHT for relinquishment, transference, and the reason for the lack of these capabilities in some referents of RIGHT, some RIGHTs have such capabilities and some have no such capabilities and will therefore be confused with JUDGMENT. In this article, the presented theories are revised and criticized and the PROPORTIONALITY between JUDGMENT and subject theory is analyzed and provided as a solution for this problem in appropriate evaluation of the relations between JUDGMENT and its subjects.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HOSSEINI, SEYYED ABDOLRAHIM. (2017). CRITERIA FOR DISTINGUISHING JUDGMENT FROM RIGHT IN LEGAL THEORIES. FEQH VA MABANI-YE HOQUQ-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR JURISPRUDENCE & ESSENTIALS OF THE ISLAMIC LAW) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), 50(1 ), 57-76. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/198508/en

Vancouver: Copy

HOSSEINI SEYYED ABDOLRAHIM. CRITERIA FOR DISTINGUISHING JUDGMENT FROM RIGHT IN LEGAL THEORIES. FEQH VA MABANI-YE HOQUQ-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR JURISPRUDENCE & ESSENTIALS OF THE ISLAMIC LAW) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA)[Internet]. 2017;50(1 ):57-76. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/198508/en

IEEE: Copy

SEYYED ABDOLRAHIM HOSSEINI, “CRITERIA FOR DISTINGUISHING JUDGMENT FROM RIGHT IN LEGAL THEORIES,” FEQH VA MABANI-YE HOQUQ-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR JURISPRUDENCE & ESSENTIALS OF THE ISLAMIC LAW) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), vol. 50, no. 1 , pp. 57–76, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/198508/en

Related Journal Papers