مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

578
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Analysis and Criticism of ShuShtaryʼ s Theory about Ibn Ghazaeriʼ sRijali Viewpoints

Pages

  299-337

Abstract

Ibn Ghazaeri is one of the important Rijalun (Men of narrators) that he is famous for numerous and fast weakening of narrators. He has weakened many reliable narrators in his book named Al Zuˈ afa. One of the contemporary narrators men ( Rijali), Sheikh Mohammad Tagh iShushtari in the book Ghamus Al Rijal, has defended him and trust very much to his weakening and preferred his viewpoints on other Rijalunʼ s viewpoints. In this essay we intend to analyze and criticize the Shushtari‘ s viewpoint about the measure of credibility of Ibn Ghazaeriʼ s weakening and then his confidences. First, we have searched the origin of weakening the narrators, then paid to recognize Ibn Al Ghazaeriʼ sRijali method and thereby criticized his Rijali method in weakening and confidences. Finally, we have assessed Shushtari‘ s opinion concerning his Rijali viewpoints in detail. The results of this essay are first recognizing the measure of validity of Ibn Ghazaeriʼ s method and his viewpoints in modifying the narrators. Particularly in contradiction of his views with other early Rijalunsʼ views. Second showing that attributing exaggeration and lie to narrators, has root in identifying the text of their hadiths. This should be meditated and antecedents have not similar view about it and this lead to doubt on absolute acceptance of them; third, showing the broad using the method of Identifying the text of narrators’ hadiths by Ibn Ghazaeri and exhibiting the cases of opposition of its results with fact.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Pashei Aghababa, Tohid, gharavi naeeni, nahleh, MAAREF, MAJID, & shakori, abolfazl. (2019). The Analysis and Criticism of ShuShtaryʼ s Theory about Ibn Ghazaeriʼ sRijali Viewpoints. KETAB-E-QAYYEM, 8(19 ), 299-337. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/201634/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Pashei Aghababa Tohid, gharavi naeeni nahleh, MAAREF MAJID, shakori abolfazl. The Analysis and Criticism of ShuShtaryʼ s Theory about Ibn Ghazaeriʼ sRijali Viewpoints. KETAB-E-QAYYEM[Internet]. 2019;8(19 ):299-337. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/201634/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Tohid Pashei Aghababa, nahleh gharavi naeeni, MAJID MAAREF, and abolfazl shakori, “The Analysis and Criticism of ShuShtaryʼ s Theory about Ibn Ghazaeriʼ sRijali Viewpoints,” KETAB-E-QAYYEM, vol. 8, no. 19 , pp. 299–337, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/201634/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button