مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,123
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

FAITH: REALISTIC OR NON-REALISTIC? HEBBLETHWAITE’S CRITIQUE OF CUPITT’S NON-REALISTIC THEISM

Pages

  95-119

Abstract

 Don Cupitt has a Non-Realistic view of God and religious faith. He holds that “human” and “God” are historical concepts which are not dependent on rationality and metaphysics. Hence, he emphasizes on the continuous evolution of these concepts in the history of religious thought. He believes that the man chooses his value himself and makes his world on this selection. In his view, spirituality is the substance of religion and has complete individual and personal characteristics. The perspective of every individual to the world is the foundation of his view and understanding of religious faith. But, Brian Hebblethwaite, who is a defender of RELIGIOUS REALISM, has tried to critique Cupitt’s Non-Realism in detail. He has some fundamental criticisms about Non-Realism in religion that amongst the most important of them is ignoring the importance of truth and denying the objectivity of moral values. He, at first, distinguishes the defects of Non-Realistic arguments of Cupitt and his version of the procedures of religious thought in modern world and then, explains how believing to objective God is not only consistent with modern thought but a necessary component of it.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    HOJJATI, GHAZALEH. (2014). FAITH: REALISTIC OR NON-REALISTIC? HEBBLETHWAITE’S CRITIQUE OF CUPITT’S NON-REALISTIC THEISM. PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS, 10(25), 95-119. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/207777/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    HOJJATI GHAZALEH. FAITH: REALISTIC OR NON-REALISTIC? HEBBLETHWAITE’S CRITIQUE OF CUPITT’S NON-REALISTIC THEISM. PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS[Internet]. 2014;10(25):95-119. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/207777/en

    IEEE: Copy

    GHAZALEH HOJJATI, “FAITH: REALISTIC OR NON-REALISTIC? HEBBLETHWAITE’S CRITIQUE OF CUPITT’S NON-REALISTIC THEISM,” PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS, vol. 10, no. 25, pp. 95–119, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/207777/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button