مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,236
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE EARLY WITTGENSTEIN: THE OPPOSITION OF LANGUAGE AND METAPHYSICS

Pages

  49-90

Abstract

 In Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Wittgenstein attempts to make a distinction between two levels of the states of affairs in order to have a logical and accurate view of the world. For Wittgenstein, metaphysics, ethics, religion, and art belong to the realm of THE TRANSCENDENTAL about which you can’t say anything. Rather, it can only be demonstrated. He refers to it as nonsense for it is meta-linguistic. The empirical world or nature is the realm which can be talked about and judged, since it is a picture of REALITY and the criterion for the truth of propositions, which is the pictorial relationship between LANGUAGE and REALITY. For Wittgenstein, precise understanding of the world requires the mentioned necessary distinction. He believes that the main metaphysical problem which philosophers historically encountered was due to the lack of this distinction and abuse of LANGUAGE. In fact, by making such a distinction he seeks to secure METAPHYSICAL PROPOSITIONS and protect them from philosophers’ interference. This implies Wittgenstein's mystical approach to this field. In this article, we will try to make it clear that Wittgenstein, through linguistic approach, made a distinction between linguistic and nonlinguistic state of affairs, and that this distinction is in itself a contradiction.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SOLEIMANI, NABIALLAH. (2017). THE EARLY WITTGENSTEIN: THE OPPOSITION OF LANGUAGE AND METAPHYSICS. PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS, 13(31 ), 49-90. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/207829/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SOLEIMANI NABIALLAH. THE EARLY WITTGENSTEIN: THE OPPOSITION OF LANGUAGE AND METAPHYSICS. PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS[Internet]. 2017;13(31 ):49-90. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/207829/en

    IEEE: Copy

    NABIALLAH SOLEIMANI, “THE EARLY WITTGENSTEIN: THE OPPOSITION OF LANGUAGE AND METAPHYSICS,” PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS, vol. 13, no. 31 , pp. 49–90, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/207829/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button