مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

796
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE UNIFICATION ACCOUNT OF EXPLANATION

Author(s)

AZAD HODA | Issue Writer Certificate 

Pages

  91-112

Abstract

 Explanation is one of the most important issues in the philosophy of science, which many attentions have been paid to it since Aristotle. The UNIFICATION account of explanation, first presented by Friedman (1974), is one of the most discussed contemporary models. According to this conception, SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION has to show that many separated ARGUMENT PATTERNs have basic similarities and via these similarities we can understand related phenomena deeper. Philip KITCHER has extended this idea and has argued that SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION aims to represent a maximum of facts and natural regularities in terms of minimum of theoretical concepts and assumptions. According to KITCHER, a few of ARGUMENT PATTERNs can be used in the explanation of many beliefs, and so we can show that how SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION amounts to UNDERSTANDING. However, the UNIFICATION account of explanation faces some problems, including the point that the relationship between UNIFICATION and UNDERSTANDING is not clear. Another difficulty concerns the relationship between explanation and the causal direction. In this paper, after presenting the main features of the UNIFICATION account of explanation and its merits over the classical D-N model, it will be argued that due to some problems in the UNIFICATION account it seem that the best way to round about these problems is to adopt a kind of explanatory “pluralism”, depending on different philosophical and scientific contexts.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    AZAD, HODA. (2012). A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE UNIFICATION ACCOUNT OF EXPLANATION. PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS, 7(20), 91-112. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/207839/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    AZAD HODA. A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE UNIFICATION ACCOUNT OF EXPLANATION. PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS[Internet]. 2012;7(20):91-112. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/207839/en

    IEEE: Copy

    HODA AZAD, “A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE UNIFICATION ACCOUNT OF EXPLANATION,” PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS, vol. 7, no. 20, pp. 91–112, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/207839/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top