A COMPARISON OF PRIMARY UNADJUSTED SCHEMES IN PATIENTS SUFFERING FROM OBSESSION-OBLIGATION PERSONALITY DISORDER WITH A NON-CLINICAL GROUP

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NADERI HABIBOLLAH; RAMZANZADEH ALIZAMANI ROGEYEH

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY STUDIES Year:2015 | Volume:5 | Issue:18 Page(s): 127-142

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

954

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON OF PRIMARY UNADJUSTED SCHEMES IN PATIENTS SUFFERING FROM OBSESSION-OBLIGATION PERSONALITY DISORDER WITH A NON-CLINICAL GROUP

Author(s)

NADERI HABIBOLLAH | RAMZANZADEH ALIZAMANI ROGEYEH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EARLY MALADAPTIVE SCHEMAQ2

PERSONALITY DISORDERSQ2

OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE PERSONALITYQ1

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate primary unadjusted schemes in patients suffering from obsession-obligation personality disorder with a non-clinical group. To this end, 50 respondents who were randomly selected from a group having obsession-obligation personality disorder (7 females and 18 males) and a non-clinical group (8 females and 17 males), completed Yang’s 90-item questionnaire of primary unadjustedschemes. The results showed that the mean and the standard deviation of the two groups were significantly different in some schemes. The Independent Samples T-Test results showed that the two groups were significantly different in self-sacrifice (t (2, 48) = 4.17; p<.001), emotional prevention (t (2, 48) = 18.81; p<.001), perseverance criteria (t (2, 48) = 18.6; p<.001), superiority (t (2, 48) = 2.82; p<.005), and self-punishment (t (2, 48) = 3.19; p<.005). The results suggest that study of schemes is an effective way for exploring fundamental factors causing personality disorder. It is suggested that further studies investigate other PERSONALITY DISORDERS.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

NADERI, HABIBOLLAH, & RAMZANZADEH ALIZAMANI, ROGEYEH. (2015). A COMPARISON OF PRIMARY UNADJUSTED SCHEMES IN PATIENTS SUFFERING FROM OBSESSION-OBLIGATION PERSONALITY DISORDER WITH A NON-CLINICAL GROUP. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY STUDIES, 5(18), 127-142. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/208491/en

Vancouver: Copy

NADERI HABIBOLLAH, RAMZANZADEH ALIZAMANI ROGEYEH. A COMPARISON OF PRIMARY UNADJUSTED SCHEMES IN PATIENTS SUFFERING FROM OBSESSION-OBLIGATION PERSONALITY DISORDER WITH A NON-CLINICAL GROUP. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY STUDIES[Internet]. 2015;5(18):127-142. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/208491/en

IEEE: Copy

HABIBOLLAH NADERI, and ROGEYEH RAMZANZADEH ALIZAMANI, “A COMPARISON OF PRIMARY UNADJUSTED SCHEMES IN PATIENTS SUFFERING FROM OBSESSION-OBLIGATION PERSONALITY DISORDER WITH A NON-CLINICAL GROUP,” CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY STUDIES, vol. 5, no. 18, pp. 127–142, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/208491/en

Related Journal Papers