CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF BLIND KILLER IN IMAMIEH JURISPRUDENCE AND IRAN RIGHTS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AMINI RAZIEH; HATAMI SEDIQEH; MOHAMADIYAN ALI

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE AND LAW Year:2016 | Volume:9 | Issue:17 Page(s): 9-26

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,175

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF BLIND KILLER IN IMAMIEH JURISPRUDENCE AND IRAN RIGHTS

Author(s)

AMINI RAZIEH | HATAMI SEDIQEH | MOHAMADIYAN ALI | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

INTENTIONAL KILLINGQ2

BLIND KILLERQ1

WILL TO CRIMEQ1

LIFE NEMESISQ1

Abstract

Nemesis or lack of nemesis of blind is one of controversial issues in Islamic jurisprudence. Some jurisconsults believe that blind against INTENTIONAL KILLING, is not and cited reasons for this idea, in this research, we try to offer proper analysis about jurisprudence and right verdict blind by checking documents of these groups of jurisconsults. One of the results of this discussion is this fact that referred reason of adverse is two narrations that have many problems. This includes presence of and lack of obstacle, scoff in narrations document, thematic conflict of two narrations, proving two syntactic readings that leads to different meaning reading. According to authors, also these narrations cannot prove acclaim of these jurisconsults, because these narrations are without acclaim and in spite of presence of generalities and signifiers on killing sanctity and proving nemesis in intentional supposition, jurisconsult doesn’t need to these two narrations. For rights, about this, explicitly these are no assertion. It seems that ruler satisfied with same generalities and absolutes of nemesis in INTENTIONAL KILLING and doesn’t know blindness solely as criminal responsibility and justifying crime, and by considering practices appearances, conceives anybody as responsible of his intentional consequences and results.

Cites

No record.

References

THE COMPARISON OF SHI'IT IS AND SUNNIS’ BELIEFS ONTALION

Cite

APA: Copy

AMINI, RAZIEH, HATAMI, SEDIQEH, & MOHAMADIYAN, ALI. (2016). CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF BLIND KILLER IN IMAMIEH JURISPRUDENCE AND IRAN RIGHTS. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE AND LAW, 9(17), 9-26. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/212132/en

Vancouver: Copy

AMINI RAZIEH, HATAMI SEDIQEH, MOHAMADIYAN ALI. CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF BLIND KILLER IN IMAMIEH JURISPRUDENCE AND IRAN RIGHTS. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE AND LAW[Internet]. 2016;9(17):9-26. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/212132/en

IEEE: Copy

RAZIEH AMINI, SEDIQEH HATAMI, and ALI MOHAMADIYAN, “CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF BLIND KILLER IN IMAMIEH JURISPRUDENCE AND IRAN RIGHTS,” JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE AND LAW, vol. 9, no. 17, pp. 9–26, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/212132/en

Related Journal Papers