The Conceptual Scope of the Rule of Hardship in Islamic Jurisprudential Sections and its Relation with Similar Words

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SHAHINFARD KHATEREH; NAZARI TAVAKKOLI SAEID; OMANI SAMANI REZA; ABEDINI AHMAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE AND LAW Year:2018 | Volume:10 | Issue:20 Page(s): 43-67

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,462

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Conceptual Scope of the Rule of Hardship in Islamic Jurisprudential Sections and its Relation with Similar Words

Author(s)

SHAHINFARD KHATEREH | NAZARI TAVAKKOLI SAEID | OMANI SAMANI REZA | ABEDINI AHMAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

HarajQ1

Negation of Haraj RuleQ1

emergency situationsQ2

HarmQ2

necessityQ1

hardshipQ1

Abstract

One of the most important juridical rules derived from a Quranic verse is the principle of no hardship which is applied in different jurisprudential topics from purity to blood money. Although this principle is presented by jurists alongside other principles such as the “ principle of no Harm” and permissibility of forbidden acts in urgent and emergency situations in inferring legal commandments, the question that needs to be examined is that with respect to the similarity of jurisprudential applications of this rule, what is the fundamental difference between this rule and other similar rules? In this research, we aim to show the similarity and differences between the word “ Haraj” and the terms “ necessity, disadvantage and urgency” in the conceptual analysis of the applications of Hraj in jurisprudential texts and to examine whether one of them can be considered as the original for other words, or if such an opportunity does not exist, one should still consider each one as separate from the other. The findings of this research show that despite the wide variation in the application of the rule of law in jurisprudential texts, “ Haraj” has a broader concept than the notion of Harm, necessity and urgency and this jurisprudential rules: necessity, urgency and Harm will be branches of the rule negation of hardship and Haraj.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SHAHINFARD, KHATEREH, NAZARI TAVAKKOLI, SAEID, OMANI SAMANI, REZA, & ABEDINI, AHMAD. (2018). The Conceptual Scope of the Rule of Hardship in Islamic Jurisprudential Sections and its Relation with Similar Words. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE AND LAW, 10(20 ), 43-67. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/212174/en

Vancouver: Copy

SHAHINFARD KHATEREH, NAZARI TAVAKKOLI SAEID, OMANI SAMANI REZA, ABEDINI AHMAD. The Conceptual Scope of the Rule of Hardship in Islamic Jurisprudential Sections and its Relation with Similar Words. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE AND LAW[Internet]. 2018;10(20 ):43-67. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/212174/en

IEEE: Copy

KHATEREH SHAHINFARD, SAEID NAZARI TAVAKKOLI, REZA OMANI SAMANI, and AHMAD ABEDINI, “The Conceptual Scope of the Rule of Hardship in Islamic Jurisprudential Sections and its Relation with Similar Words,” JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE AND LAW, vol. 10, no. 20 , pp. 43–67, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/212174/en

Related Journal Papers