Grounds of Doctrine of “ Protected Blood May not be Spoiled” According to the 2013 IPC

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Alishahi Ghalehjouqh Abolfazl; AHMADI TAYEBEH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE AND LAW Year:2018 | Volume:11 | Issue:21 Page(s): 131-159

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,731

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Grounds of Doctrine of “ Protected Blood May not be Spoiled” According to the 2013 IPC

Author(s)

Alishahi Ghalehjouqh Abolfazl | AHMADI TAYEBEH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

MurderQ1

DiyahQ2

Muslim’s blood may not be spoiledQ1

Bayt al-MaalQ1

Physical Damage FundQ1

Abstract

Islam very much values human blood protection and does not allow a drop of blood to be spoiled; the Islamic Penal Code also states in Article 478 that "If the killer is not identified, Absolutely, Bayt al-Maal is responsible for Diyah. " However, pursuant to Article 10 of the Civil Liability Compulsory Insurance Act covering the owners of motor vehicles against third parties, approved on September, 2013, intended to "protect victims of traffic accidents, and to cover the escaping or failed identification of the faulty party", the Physical Damage Fund is responsible for for paying the Diyah. Given the above, where the common element is "failed identification of the Murderer", but the Diyah's payment entity is different, a question rises as to what is the judicial precedent on the payment of Diyah? What is the relation between the two funds? This paper concluded that, according to the 2008 judicial precedent, for the payment of Diyah in prosecutor’ s office and courts, these two funds are sometimes held liable longitudinally (first, the Physical Damage Fund for damages, and then Bayt al-Maal), and sometimes horizontally (both the Physical Damage Fund for damages and Bayt al-Maal simultaneously). Or first the judge initially holds the Physical Damage Fund liable for paying Diyah and then holds Bayt al-Maal liable for paying the difference. However, according to the judiciary's legal department's opinion issued in 2013, these two funds are distinguished, and in the event of physical damage, the Physical Damage Fund is responsible for the payment of the Diyah, and if the killer is not identified, the dependents of the victim may refer to Bayt al-Maal to receive Diyah.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Alishahi Ghalehjouqh, Abolfazl, & AHMADI, TAYEBEH. (2018). Grounds of Doctrine of “ Protected Blood May not be Spoiled” According to the 2013 IPC. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE AND LAW, 11(21 ), 131-159. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/212194/en

Vancouver: Copy

Alishahi Ghalehjouqh Abolfazl, AHMADI TAYEBEH. Grounds of Doctrine of “ Protected Blood May not be Spoiled” According to the 2013 IPC. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE AND LAW[Internet]. 2018;11(21 ):131-159. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/212194/en

IEEE: Copy

Abolfazl Alishahi Ghalehjouqh, and TAYEBEH AHMADI, “Grounds of Doctrine of “ Protected Blood May not be Spoiled” According to the 2013 IPC,” JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE AND LAW, vol. 11, no. 21 , pp. 131–159, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/212194/en

Related Journal Papers