THE EXAMINATION OF THE TRADITION “READ SUCH AS PEOPLE READ” WITH A LOOK TO THE SHEIKH ANSARI COMPREHENSION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MAHDAVI RAD MUHAMMAD ALI; DELBARI SEYYED ALI; NOSRATI ALI

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: QURANIC DOCTRINES Year:2013 | Volume:- | Issue:17 Page(s): 49-70

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,137

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE EXAMINATION OF THE TRADITION “READ SUCH AS PEOPLE READ” WITH A LOOK TO THE SHEIKH ANSARI COMPREHENSION

Author(s)

MAHDAVI RAD MUHAMMAD ALI | DELBARI SEYYED ALI | NOSRATI ALI | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

THE QURANQ2

RECITATIONQ2

PEOPLE’S RECITATIONQ2

THE SEVEN READINGS OF THE QURANQ2

SHEIKH ANSARIQ2

Abstract

From the ancient times, there has been a debate between Islamic scholars and jurists on which RECITATION of THE QURAN is authentic and acceptable. Different opinions have stated to answer this question. The examination of evidences clarifies that the most important reason is the tradition “Read such as people read”. This research with analytic-descriptive method studies the mentioned tradition from a textual perspective and the genuineness of the Hadith and shows the genuineness of the Hadith and the SHEIKH ANSARI comprehension is not defensible. The author believes that the tradition proves the BOOK and the present RECITATION and rejects the other.

Cites

No record.

References