مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

541
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

GENTZEN AND HACKING ON STRUCTURAL AND OPERATIONAL RULES IN THE DEFINITION OF LOGICAL CONSTANTS, REVIEW AND CRITIQUE

Pages

  117-141

Abstract

 Gentzen divides rules of logical system into ‘operational rules’ and ‘structural rules’. By OPERATIONAL RULES she means the rules of introduction and elimination of a logical constant. STRUCTURAL RULES represent the fundamental (structural) characteristics of an argument in such a way that any change in them causes changing in the whole system. In his works, Gentzen mentions that the meaning of LOGICAL CONSTANTS can be achieved only through OPERATIONAL RULES. This point is the infrastructure of INFERENTIALISM approach on meaningfulness of LOGICAL CONSTANTS. Christopher Peacocke criticizes the basis of INFERENTIALISM approach. He believes that all structural and OPERATIONAL RULES should be considered as the definition of LOGICAL CONSTANTS. In response to this claim, Ian Hacking argued that accepting Peacock’s idea, will lead to a lack of conservation. Lack of conservation causes system incompatibility. In this paper, after careful examination of STRUCTURAL RULES and expressing its difference with OPERATIONAL RULES, Hacking argument will be evaluated and criticized and finally a solution to the problem will be presented.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MAZGINEJAD, MORTEZA, NABAVI, LOTFOLLAH, & HOJATI, SEYED MOHAMMAD. (2015). GENTZEN AND HACKING ON STRUCTURAL AND OPERATIONAL RULES IN THE DEFINITION OF LOGICAL CONSTANTS, REVIEW AND CRITIQUE. MANTEQ-PAZHUHI (LOGICAL STUDIES), 6(1 (11)), 117-141. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/216426/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MAZGINEJAD MORTEZA, NABAVI LOTFOLLAH, HOJATI SEYED MOHAMMAD. GENTZEN AND HACKING ON STRUCTURAL AND OPERATIONAL RULES IN THE DEFINITION OF LOGICAL CONSTANTS, REVIEW AND CRITIQUE. MANTEQ-PAZHUHI (LOGICAL STUDIES)[Internet]. 2015;6(1 (11)):117-141. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/216426/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MORTEZA MAZGINEJAD, LOTFOLLAH NABAVI, and SEYED MOHAMMAD HOJATI, “GENTZEN AND HACKING ON STRUCTURAL AND OPERATIONAL RULES IN THE DEFINITION OF LOGICAL CONSTANTS, REVIEW AND CRITIQUE,” MANTEQ-PAZHUHI (LOGICAL STUDIES), vol. 6, no. 1 (11), pp. 117–141, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/216426/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top