THE PART OF BILIK IN HARE’S PHILOSOPHY OF ETHICS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MAHDAVINEZHAD MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN; ZAMANI MAHDI; BARADARAN RAFIEI ALI REZA; TAQIAN VARZANEH REZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Research Quarterly in Islamic Ethics Year:2012 | Volume:5 | Issue:15 Page(s): 117-131

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

956

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE PART OF BILIK IN HARE’S PHILOSOPHY OF ETHICS

Author(s)

MAHDAVINEZHAD MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN | ZAMANI MAHDI | BARADARAN RAFIEI ALI REZA | TAQIAN VARZANEH REZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

HAREQ3

RELIGIOUS STATEMENTQ3

BILIKQ3

OBJECTIVITYQ2

ETHICAL REASONINGQ2

Abstract

HARE agrees with religious claims not to be provable, falsifiable, and cognitive. However, for him, RELIGIOUS STATEMENTs are bliks or mental nonfalsifiable suppositions that prepare certain deep comment of the world and a certain vision for man with such a extended realm which include all requisite affairs in human life. And this is the reason why for their being useful. Furthermore, HARE, in his metaethic view, has sought to attain a manner of reasonability in ethics upon which can be built OBJECTIVITY of ethical principles. HARE has known trueness and falsifiability and generalization as requisites for ethical OBJECTIVITY and has thought opinions preparing such requisites. Yet it seems that the teaching of BILIK would lead to mentality and relativism as two damages of reasonable ethics. The failure has made HARE’s school of ethics as one self-contradicted.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MAHDAVINEZHAD, MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN, ZAMANI, MAHDI, BARADARAN RAFIEI, ALI REZA, & TAQIAN VARZANEH, REZA. (2012). THE PART OF BILIK IN HARE’S PHILOSOPHY OF ETHICS. PAZHUHESH NAME-E AKHLAGH, 5(15), 117-131. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/217445/en

Vancouver: Copy

MAHDAVINEZHAD MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN, ZAMANI MAHDI, BARADARAN RAFIEI ALI REZA, TAQIAN VARZANEH REZA. THE PART OF BILIK IN HARE’S PHILOSOPHY OF ETHICS. PAZHUHESH NAME-E AKHLAGH[Internet]. 2012;5(15):117-131. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/217445/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN MAHDAVINEZHAD, MAHDI ZAMANI, ALI REZA BARADARAN RAFIEI, and REZA TAQIAN VARZANEH, “THE PART OF BILIK IN HARE’S PHILOSOPHY OF ETHICS,” PAZHUHESH NAME-E AKHLAGH, vol. 5, no. 15, pp. 117–131, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/217445/en

Related Journal Papers