AN ATTEMPT TO REWRITE THE THEORY OF INEFFECTIVENESS OF MORA'A

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KARIMI ABBAS

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Judicial Law Views Year:2012 | Volume:17 | Issue:58 Page(s): 157-188

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,641

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

AN ATTEMPT TO REWRITE THE THEORY OF INEFFECTIVENESS OF MORA'A

Author(s)

KARIMI ABBAS | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

INEFFECTIVENESSQ1

MORA'AQ1

MOGHOOFQ2

IMPOSSIBILITY TO INVOKEQ1

THIRD PARTYQ2

Abstract

This article tries to justify the theory of INEFFECTIVENESS of MORA'A [1] the purpose of the article is to explore the theory together with its justification and to introduce it as a legal rule. In the article we make clear the difference between INEFFECTIVENESS of MOGHOOF [2] and MORA'A in both legal and consequential aspects, and when the theory of INEFFECTIVENESS of MORA'A can be applied? Our conclusion is that, contrary to MOGHOOF in contracts, for MORA'A in contracts to be effective there is no need for the permission of those who enjoy rights in the contract, but it suffices to ensure their rights later for the contract to remain effective. Therefore, we believe such a contract shall become automatically effective, even if the holder of the right/s had rejected that MORA'A contract. In contrast, a MORA'A contract is ineffective when the contract is against a THIRD PARTY and his rights or ownership are not taken into consideration.By studying all implications of this legal concept, it seems that the INEFFECTIVENESS mentioned in the judgment of the General Council of Iran Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) in its verdict No.620 dated 20/09/1376 (11/12/1997) means they saw a contract of MORA'A ineffective. On the other hand the concept of IMPOSSIBILITY TO INVOKE, which is imported to Iran legal system as theory of "Impossibility", has no more implication taking into account the theory of INEFFECTIVENESS of MORA'A. My suggestion is to use the word "INEFFECTIVENESS of MORA'A" with its original and domestic meaning.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KARIMI, ABBAS. (2012). AN ATTEMPT TO REWRITE THE THEORY OF INEFFECTIVENESS OF MORA'A. JOURNAL OF JUDICIAL LAW VIEWS, 17(58), 157-188. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/217861/en

Vancouver: Copy

KARIMI ABBAS. AN ATTEMPT TO REWRITE THE THEORY OF INEFFECTIVENESS OF MORA'A. JOURNAL OF JUDICIAL LAW VIEWS[Internet]. 2012;17(58):157-188. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/217861/en

IEEE: Copy

ABBAS KARIMI, “AN ATTEMPT TO REWRITE THE THEORY OF INEFFECTIVENESS OF MORA'A,” JOURNAL OF JUDICIAL LAW VIEWS, vol. 17, no. 58, pp. 157–188, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/217861/en

Related Journal Papers