مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

3,951
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A CRITICAL STUDY OF NUMBER 1373/11/29-146 VOTE OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF CAJ IN COMPETENCY OF COURT OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE IN INVESTIGATING COMPLAINTS OF FIRM OF FOUNDATION OF JANBAZAN AND MOSTAZAFAN

Pages

  51-69

Abstract

 In 1373. the General Assembly of CAJ in the vote of process unity of Number 146 considered the firms of Foundation of Janbazan and Mostazafan as governmental firms and did not recognize its jurisdiction based on the Constitution the Article 173 and the Act of CAJ (approved 1360) the Article II (the Act of CAJ that approved in 1385 the Article 13) for investigating their complains. This process has considered by the Public Council and the branches of CAJ. This vote is possible to survey in two aspects: competency of C AJ in investigating the complaints of governmental firms and reasoning of CAJ that the firms of Foundation of Janbazan and Mostazafan are governmental. This article examines briefly the first subject and the second subject in detail. After examining the legal essence of firms of Foundation of Janbazan and Mostazafan as a PUBLIC NON-GOVERNMENTAL INSTITUTION and with considering different regulations, it is identified that firms of Foundation of Janbazan and Mostazafan are neither governmental firm nor PUBLIC NON-GOVERNMENTAL INSTITUTION. Consequently, CAJ has competency to investigate the complaints of these firms against governmental companies like other individuals of private law. As a result. the vote of CAJ broke the rights of these firms in referring to and complaining in CAJ, that it is against the applicable law, and legal principles and measurements.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    ANSARI, ALI, & RAJI, SEYYED MOHAMMAD H.. (2009). A CRITICAL STUDY OF NUMBER 1373/11/29-146 VOTE OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF CAJ IN COMPETENCY OF COURT OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE IN INVESTIGATING COMPLAINTS OF FIRM OF FOUNDATION OF JANBAZAN AND MOSTAZAFAN. AZAD LEGAL RESEARCHES, -(4), 51-69. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/219645/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    ANSARI ALI, RAJI SEYYED MOHAMMAD H.. A CRITICAL STUDY OF NUMBER 1373/11/29-146 VOTE OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF CAJ IN COMPETENCY OF COURT OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE IN INVESTIGATING COMPLAINTS OF FIRM OF FOUNDATION OF JANBAZAN AND MOSTAZAFAN. AZAD LEGAL RESEARCHES[Internet]. 2009;-(4):51-69. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/219645/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ALI ANSARI, and SEYYED MOHAMMAD H. RAJI, “A CRITICAL STUDY OF NUMBER 1373/11/29-146 VOTE OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF CAJ IN COMPETENCY OF COURT OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE IN INVESTIGATING COMPLAINTS OF FIRM OF FOUNDATION OF JANBAZAN AND MOSTAZAFAN,” AZAD LEGAL RESEARCHES, vol. -, no. 4, pp. 51–69, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/219645/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button