DESCRIBING AND ASSESSING KANT’S INNATIVISM IN IRANIAN CONTEMPORARY PHILOSOPHICAL THOUGHT

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

OMID MASOUD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: HEKMAT-E MO’ASER (CONTEMPORARY WISDOM) Year:2011 | Volume:1 | Issue:2 (2) Page(s): 41-58

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,332

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

DESCRIBING AND ASSESSING KANT’S INNATIVISM IN IRANIAN CONTEMPORARY PHILOSOPHICAL THOUGHT

Author(s)

OMID MASOUD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

IRANIAN CONTEMPORARY PHILOSOPHICAL THOUGHTQ3

KANT’S INNATIVISMQ3

THE INTERPRETATIONS OF KANT’S INNATIVISMQ3

MAXIMAL INNATIVISMQ3

MINIMAL INNATIVISMQ3

Abstract

In this paper, I try to discuss about one of the important issues which have been discussed in the dialogue between IRANIAN CONTEMPORARY PHILOSOPHICAL THOUGHT and the philosophy of Kant. Many of Kant’s Iranian critics criticized innativism according to a special version of it. This special version, has been arisen for the first time in the essential encounter of Iranian contemporary islamic philosophy with the philosophy of Kant in Allāmeh Tabatabayi’s “Osule” Falsafeh va Raveshe Realism [= the principles of philosophy and the method of realism”. This version is still alive in Iran and forms the foundation of the criticism of Kant’s epistemology. According to this, in this paper, I will discuss, first, about the prevalence of believing in Kantian innativism among the Iranian scholars. Then, I will discuss about one of the current versions of Kantian innativism in the IRANIAN CONTEMPORARY PHILOSOPHICAL THOUGHT and will consider its elements. This version of Kantian innativism can be found in Mortaza Motahhari’s works. Finally, I will state Kant’s own view of innativism in order to clarify the similarities and differences of his view and his critics’ view of innativism.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

OMID, MASOUD. (2011). DESCRIBING AND ASSESSING KANT’S INNATIVISM IN IRANIAN CONTEMPORARY PHILOSOPHICAL THOUGHT. HEKMAT-E MO’ASER (CONTEMPORARY WISDOM), 1(2 (2)), 41-58. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/220737/en

Vancouver: Copy

OMID MASOUD. DESCRIBING AND ASSESSING KANT’S INNATIVISM IN IRANIAN CONTEMPORARY PHILOSOPHICAL THOUGHT. HEKMAT-E MO’ASER (CONTEMPORARY WISDOM)[Internet]. 2011;1(2 (2)):41-58. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/220737/en

IEEE: Copy

MASOUD OMID, “DESCRIBING AND ASSESSING KANT’S INNATIVISM IN IRANIAN CONTEMPORARY PHILOSOPHICAL THOUGHT,” HEKMAT-E MO’ASER (CONTEMPORARY WISDOM), vol. 1, no. 2 (2), pp. 41–58, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/220737/en

Related Journal Papers