ALLAMAH TABATABAII ON THE COMPATIBILITY OF THE CAUSAL NECESSITY AND THE HUMAN FREEDOM

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SAEEDIMEHR MOHAMMAD; MOGHADDAS SAEED

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: HEKMAT-E MO’ASER (CONTEMPORARY WISDOM) Year:2013 | Volume:3 | Issue:2 Page(s): 99-123

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

913

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

ALLAMAH TABATABAII ON THE COMPATIBILITY OF THE CAUSAL NECESSITY AND THE HUMAN FREEDOM

Author(s)

SAEEDIMEHR MOHAMMAD | MOGHADDAS SAEED | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

HUMAN FREEDOMQ2

WILLQ2

CAUSAL NECESSITYQ2

ALLAMEH TABATABAIIQ2

Abstract

There are two main philosophical theories concerning the explanation of the relation between the CAUSAL NECESSITY and the HUMAN FREEDOM: 1. Compatibilism, which believes that the CAUSAL NECESSITY is compatible with the HUMAN FREEDOM, and incompatibilism, which sees these two incompatible. Allamah Tabatabaii proposes a specific version of compatibilism based on the notion of “comparative contingency” (al-imkan al-bilqiyas). According to his theory, the principle of CAUSAL NECESSITY does not require more than that the human free action possess comparative contingency in comparison with the human agent and comparative necessity in comparison with its complex perfect cause (al-illah al-tammah). Moreover, the very nature of the HUMAN FREEDOM is nothing but the action’s being contingent in relation to his agent. Therefore, the causal comparative necessity of the action in relation to its complex perfect cause does not contradict its being free. This compatibilist view has been challenged by some contemporary philosophers. In this paper we first give a short explication of Tbatabaii’s theory and then examine the arguments of its critics.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SAEEDIMEHR, MOHAMMAD, & MOGHADDAS, SAEED. (2013). ALLAMAH TABATABAII ON THE COMPATIBILITY OF THE CAUSAL NECESSITY AND THE HUMAN FREEDOM. HEKMAT-E MO’ASER (CONTEMPORARY WISDOM), 3(2), 99-123. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/220748/en

Vancouver: Copy

SAEEDIMEHR MOHAMMAD, MOGHADDAS SAEED. ALLAMAH TABATABAII ON THE COMPATIBILITY OF THE CAUSAL NECESSITY AND THE HUMAN FREEDOM. HEKMAT-E MO’ASER (CONTEMPORARY WISDOM)[Internet]. 2013;3(2):99-123. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/220748/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD SAEEDIMEHR, and SAEED MOGHADDAS, “ALLAMAH TABATABAII ON THE COMPATIBILITY OF THE CAUSAL NECESSITY AND THE HUMAN FREEDOM,” HEKMAT-E MO’ASER (CONTEMPORARY WISDOM), vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 99–123, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/220748/en

Related Journal Papers