Proving “ the Validity of Lexicologist’ s Statement” Relying on Field Studies and the Lexical History of Arab

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Maleki Nahavandi Mohammad

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Islamic jurisprudence Resaerch Year:2016 | Volume:12 | Issue:2 Page(s): 415-445

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

612

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Proving “ the Validity of Lexicologist’ s Statement” Relying on Field Studies and the Lexical History of Arab

Author(s)

Maleki Nahavandi Mohammad | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

LexicologistQ1

validityQ1

History of LexicographyQ1

ProficiencyQ1

Abstract

Proving “ the validity of Lexicologist’ s statement” is an important matter in the Principles of Jurisprudence which has not been considered yet in the perspective of the realities of the lexical history. The word “ Lexicologist” also has not been defined yet. Both of them will be defined in detail in the present text. The History of Lexicography indicates that the Arabic words have been communicated to us properly and completely. The history is significantly confidence-building and although in some cases a number of the scholars of the Principles of Jurisprudence have been working efficiently to prove “ Lexicologist’ s statement” in different ways like Lexicologist’ s Proficiency, Insidā d e-Ṣ aghī r, the practice of the wise people, and Ijmā ٫ (unanimous consensus of Mujtaḥ idī n), it is not sufficient. Field studies and historical investigations of the Arab lexicography make it clear that “ the clear history of Arab lexicography, the proper communication of the words, the Arab’ s original explanations” and “ Lexicologist’ s Proficiency”-of course in a new explanation-are two major evidences to prove the validity of the Lexicologist’ s statement.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Maleki Nahavandi, Mohammad. (2016). Proving “ the Validity of Lexicologist’ s Statement” Relying on Field Studies and the Lexical History of Arab. ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE RESEARCH, 12(2 ), 415-445. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/220976/en

Vancouver: Copy

Maleki Nahavandi Mohammad. Proving “ the Validity of Lexicologist’ s Statement” Relying on Field Studies and the Lexical History of Arab. ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE RESEARCH[Internet]. 2016;12(2 ):415-445. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/220976/en

IEEE: Copy

Mohammad Maleki Nahavandi, “Proving “ the Validity of Lexicologist’ s Statement” Relying on Field Studies and the Lexical History of Arab,” ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE RESEARCH, vol. 12, no. 2 , pp. 415–445, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/220976/en

Related Journal Papers