CRITIQUE OF GUYER’S UNDERSTANDING ON KANT’S IDEALISM

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Rajabi Mazdak

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: QARBSHENASI-YE BONYADI (OCCIDENTAL STUDIES) Year:2016 | Volume:7 | Issue:1 Page(s): 1-19

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

605

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CRITIQUE OF GUYER’S UNDERSTANDING ON KANT’S IDEALISM

Author(s)

Rajabi Mazdak | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

IDEALISMQ1

NOUMENONQ2

PHENOMENONQ1

TRANSCENDENTALQ2

REPRESENTATIONQ2

APPEARANCEQ2

APPERCEPTIONQ2

Abstract

In this paper I try to refute Guyer’s reading of Kant’s refutation of IDEALISM in a way in which I defend Kant’s IDEALISM which has been denied by Guyer. By the notion of IDEALISM according to Kant’s philosophy I mean we are not allowed to use space referring to thing in itself, as opposed to Guyer’s claim. In other words according to Kant objects of experience are objectively constructed by subject based upon lawful connection between them, as he expresses in the first analogy of experience, overlooking what they are really in themselves as mind-independent reality. I shall show Kant’s refutation of IDEALISM does not involve any knowledge of thing in itself as opposed to Guyer’s reading; rather, Kant uses outer thing as an object of experience, that is, outer things are experience-sensations under application of categories. Some scholars such as Allison (2004) have defended Kant’s IDEALISM. Dina Emundts (2010) shows, as opposed to Guyer’s claim, Kant has located refutation of IDEALISM in the right place, namely after analogies of experience in edition B. She also shows refutation of IDEALISM can attain its goal and it does not thus fail; that is, it can rebut problematic IDEALISM. I endeavor to concentrate on the issue which indicates Kant uses outer thing in refutation of IDEALISM in edition B as object of experience not as thing in itself. Meanwhile, I rebut Guyer’s argument and adduce my own reasons point-by-point in order to defend Kant’s IDEALISM.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Rajabi, Mazdak. (2016). CRITIQUE OF GUYER’S UNDERSTANDING ON KANT’S IDEALISM. QARBSHENASI-YE BONYADI (OCCIDENTAL STUDIES), 7(1), 1-19. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/221112/en

Vancouver: Copy

Rajabi Mazdak. CRITIQUE OF GUYER’S UNDERSTANDING ON KANT’S IDEALISM. QARBSHENASI-YE BONYADI (OCCIDENTAL STUDIES)[Internet]. 2016;7(1):1-19. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/221112/en

IEEE: Copy

Mazdak Rajabi, “CRITIQUE OF GUYER’S UNDERSTANDING ON KANT’S IDEALISM,” QARBSHENASI-YE BONYADI (OCCIDENTAL STUDIES), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/221112/en

Related Journal Papers