مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

853
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

POJMAN’S VIEW ON THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF KIERKEGAARD’S THOUGH

Pages

  99-118

Abstract

 A passionate faith is the like for every religious view. In KIERKEGAARD's view, this PASSIONMENT depends on paradox and obtained only belief and practice to "absurd". Hence any objective approach decays any PASSIONMENT and merely can have passionate faith with subjective approach. The one hand, KIERKEGAARD's basis of Idea is the belief in an incommensurabilism position and the other hand, volitionalism position to knowledge. The critiques included on this KIERKEGAARD’s view that known "the passion argument", including three critiques of LOUIS POJMAN that based on his theory about religious EPISTEMOLOGY. At the begging, this article will look briefly the special LOUIS POJMAN’s view in KIERKEGAARD’s philosophy. In the next step, I will present the logical exposition of the Pojman’s religious EPISTEMOLOGY and will see that rational framework of Pojman’s vision in the relationship between reason and faith is the weak-commensurabilism – against two theory: incommensurabilism and strong-commensurabilism, and so based on the soft-perspectivism – against two position: nonperspectivism and hard-perspectivism. In the final step we see the Pojman’s critique against "The passion argument", and will know that this KIERKEGAARD’s idea faced serious epistemological criticism.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    MAHMUDI, HOSSEIN. (2012). POJMAN’S VIEW ON THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF KIERKEGAARD’S THOUGH. JOSTARHA-YE FALSAFE-YE DIN (PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION STUDIES ), 1(1), 99-118. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/222394/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MAHMUDI HOSSEIN. POJMAN’S VIEW ON THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF KIERKEGAARD’S THOUGH. JOSTARHA-YE FALSAFE-YE DIN (PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION STUDIES )[Internet]. 2012;1(1):99-118. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/222394/en

    IEEE: Copy

    HOSSEIN MAHMUDI, “POJMAN’S VIEW ON THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF KIERKEGAARD’S THOUGH,” JOSTARHA-YE FALSAFE-YE DIN (PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION STUDIES ), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 99–118, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/222394/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button