SINAN LOGIC, NECESSITIES, AND GAPS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

JAFARI WALANI ALI ASGHAR

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY Year:2011 | Volume:2 | Issue:2 (6) Page(s): 135-151

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

859

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

SINAN LOGIC, NECESSITIES, AND GAPS

Author(s)

JAFARI WALANI ALI ASGHAR | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SINAN LOGICAL STUDYQ1

NINE-PART LOGICAL STUDYQ2

FACT-ITSELF STRUCTUREQ2

COLLECTIVE STRUCTUREQ3

TWO-PART LOGICAL STUDYQ2

Abstract

There are two different types of research on logic. On the one hand, the issues of concept and attaining it, judgment and attaining it and the premises of each must be discussed in logic. Naturally, one must first discuss concepts and then judgments and all logicians have discussed both concepts and attaining them, and judgments and attaining them observing the order mentioned above. Therefore, the division of logical discussions into two groups in this sense has attracted the attention of all logicians. On the other hand, there are some differences between logicians concerning determining the different parts of logic and the order of logical issues. The same differences have created two methods in compiling logical issues: a “nine-part” method and a “two part” method. Apparently, regarding research on logic, Ibn Sina followed both methods. Therefore, if we wish to consider a dimension for the “two-part” and not “nine-part” logical studies, it will only depend on its collective and historical structure of logic rather than its real and factitself structure.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

JAFARI WALANI, ALI ASGHAR. (2011). SINAN LOGIC, NECESSITIES, AND GAPS. HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, 2(2 (6)), 135-151. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/223098/en

Vancouver: Copy

JAFARI WALANI ALI ASGHAR. SINAN LOGIC, NECESSITIES, AND GAPS. HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY[Internet]. 2011;2(2 (6)):135-151. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/223098/en

IEEE: Copy

ALI ASGHAR JAFARI WALANI, “SINAN LOGIC, NECESSITIES, AND GAPS,” HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, vol. 2, no. 2 (6), pp. 135–151, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/223098/en

Related Journal Papers