Roman Ingarden’ s critics on Husserl Phenomenology

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SALMANI ALI; Sakhavati Monir

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal Ontological Researches Year:2019 | Volume:7 | Issue:14 Page(s): 143-160

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

738

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Roman Ingarden’ s critics on Husserl Phenomenology

Author(s)

SALMANI ALI | Sakhavati Monir | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

phenomenologyQ1

IngardenQ1

HusserlQ2

Abstract

Ingarden is a realist phenomenologist who believes that Husserl in his logical investigation has accepted a kind of realism which its base is distinction between consciousness and reality. This realism dismissed with the beginning of Husserl’ s transcendental idealism replaced by consciousness and transcendental Idealism. Ingarden has opposed the sudden transformation and believed that transcendental thought has its own problems in the goal and the method. He believes that the whole idealism is not logically coherent. The scheme of the conception of transcendental idealism, its goal and method raised confusion and then inconsistency. Husserl by using Epoch method ignores actuality of thing's existence and by exercising phenomenological reductionism reached the absoluteness of consciousness and transcendental ego and finally by proposing constitutional conception replaced realistic objects by meaning or noema. These tasks invalidate the real existence and has doubted Husserl’ s original goal that was knowledge of objective data. Rigorous philosophy which is reached by this method confines itself to immanent perception. Ingarden has pointed to petition principia problem in Husserl's reductionist method, claims that Husserl's results in the transcendental thought is not an achievement of mere epistemology. In many cases his results is more like to metaphysical propositions which derived from ontological elements.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SALMANI, ALI, & Sakhavati, Monir. (2019). Roman Ingarden’ s critics on Husserl Phenomenology. JOURNAL OF ONTOLOGICAL RESEARCHES, 7(14 ), 143-160. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/226096/en

Vancouver: Copy

SALMANI ALI, Sakhavati Monir. Roman Ingarden’ s critics on Husserl Phenomenology. JOURNAL OF ONTOLOGICAL RESEARCHES[Internet]. 2019;7(14 ):143-160. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/226096/en

IEEE: Copy

ALI SALMANI, and Monir Sakhavati, “Roman Ingarden’ s critics on Husserl Phenomenology,” JOURNAL OF ONTOLOGICAL RESEARCHES, vol. 7, no. 14 , pp. 143–160, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/226096/en

Related Journal Papers