JURIDICAL STUDYING AND CRITICIZING THE REASONS OF THE RELIABILITY OF THE WRITING OF DEBT

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MASJED SARAEI HAMID; NABI NIA KHALED

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: CIVIL JURISPRUDENCE DOCTRINES Year:2014 | Volume:- | Issue:8 Page(s): 177-198

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

920

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

JURIDICAL STUDYING AND CRITICIZING THE REASONS OF THE RELIABILITY OF THE WRITING OF DEBT

Author(s)

MASJED SARAEI HAMID | NABI NIA KHALED | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DOCUMENTQ2

DEBTQ2

EVIDENCEQ2

WRITINGQ2

Abstract

In addition to the abundant emphases that the Quran has made on the WRITING of the DEBT, Shiite jurisprudents have regarded the verse 282 of the chapter Baqara and deferent traditions as the reasons for the reliability and validity of the WRITING DEBT and have considered it as valid EVIDENCE. On the other hand, announcing contrary position, some of Islamic intellectuals have considered the denotation of these reasons, particularly the traditions that have come in this field, as insufficient for proving the validity of WRITING DEBT. Traditional studying of this subject and propounding the available difficulties and criticizing and considering them and rejecting the inferences that opponents have of these traditions that WRITING DEBT is not valid, we concluded in this paper that the above verse and the traditions which are available in this respect have complete denotation on the validity of the written DOCUMENT as one of the reasons of proving the subject and all the difficulties and questions can be answered and rejected.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MASJED SARAEI, HAMID, & NABI NIA, KHALED. (2014). JURIDICAL STUDYING AND CRITICIZING THE REASONS OF THE RELIABILITY OF THE WRITING OF DEBT. CIVIL JURISPRUDENCE DOCTRINES, -(8), 177-198. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/227190/en

Vancouver: Copy

MASJED SARAEI HAMID, NABI NIA KHALED. JURIDICAL STUDYING AND CRITICIZING THE REASONS OF THE RELIABILITY OF THE WRITING OF DEBT. CIVIL JURISPRUDENCE DOCTRINES[Internet]. 2014;-(8):177-198. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/227190/en

IEEE: Copy

HAMID MASJED SARAEI, and KHALED NABI NIA, “JURIDICAL STUDYING AND CRITICIZING THE REASONS OF THE RELIABILITY OF THE WRITING OF DEBT,” CIVIL JURISPRUDENCE DOCTRINES, vol. -, no. 8, pp. 177–198, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/227190/en

Related Journal Papers