A CRITIQUE ON THE INDICATION (REVEALER) THEORY OF THE LATTER CONSENT OF THE COMPELLED PERSON

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SHEKARI ROSHANALI; DASHTI MUHAMMAD REZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: CIVIL JURISPRUDENCE DOCTRINES Year:2013 | Volume:- | Issue:7 Page(s): 3-26

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

781

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A CRITIQUE ON THE INDICATION (REVEALER) THEORY OF THE LATTER CONSENT OF THE COMPELLED PERSON

Author(s)

SHEKARI ROSHANALI | DASHTI MUHAMMAD REZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CONSENTQ2

UNWILLINGNESSQ2

COMPELLED PERSONQ1

DEDUCTIONQ2

REVEALERQ2

CONVEYANCEQ2

Abstract

Article 190 of the civil code has stated the general principles of the validity of the contracts. According to this article, the mutual agreement (CONSENT) and intent are necessary to carry out a contract. Absence of the intent causes the annulment of contracts and the absence of assent is rendered of no effect. The concurrence of the intent and assent is not the provision of the validity of the contracts and it is possible to be settled a contract with intention while it has no authentic CONSENT. Such a person who carries out the contract under the external illegal pressure is called a COMPELLED PERSON.The contract which is established under the UNWILLINGNESS is no effect and with the subsequent CONSENT of the compelled is enforceable. The civil code has no special ordinance about the subsequent CONSENT but it has considered the owner permission as indication (revealer) in an unauthorized contract. The law scholars, with the adoption of the criterion of an unauthorized contract extend the verdict of article258 of the civil code to compelled contracts. From one side, with respect to the bases of an unauthorized contract and article 258 of the civil code and the provisions of the reasoning validity from the way of deductive reasoning from other side, it seems that the mentioned deductive reasoning is not the authentic deductive reasoning. At the end with citation to the legal principles, it could be accepted the CONVEYANCE of the subsequent CONSENT of the COMPELLED PERSON in compelled contracts.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SHEKARI, ROSHANALI, & DASHTI, MUHAMMAD REZA. (2013). A CRITIQUE ON THE INDICATION (REVEALER) THEORY OF THE LATTER CONSENT OF THE COMPELLED PERSON. CIVIL JURISPRUDENCE DOCTRINES, -(7), 3-26. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/227209/en

Vancouver: Copy

SHEKARI ROSHANALI, DASHTI MUHAMMAD REZA. A CRITIQUE ON THE INDICATION (REVEALER) THEORY OF THE LATTER CONSENT OF THE COMPELLED PERSON. CIVIL JURISPRUDENCE DOCTRINES[Internet]. 2013;-(7):3-26. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/227209/en

IEEE: Copy

ROSHANALI SHEKARI, and MUHAMMAD REZA DASHTI, “A CRITIQUE ON THE INDICATION (REVEALER) THEORY OF THE LATTER CONSENT OF THE COMPELLED PERSON,” CIVIL JURISPRUDENCE DOCTRINES, vol. -, no. 7, pp. 3–26, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/227209/en

Related Journal Papers