A Survey of Jurisprudential Principles of Necessity in Contracts to Evaluate Religious Frame of Act 219 of Civil Law

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AHANGARAN MOHAMMAD RASOOL

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: ISLAMIC LAW RESEARCH JOURNAL Year:2019 | Volume:19 | Issue:2 (48) Page(s): 301-318

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,814

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Survey of Jurisprudential Principles of Necessity in Contracts to Evaluate Religious Frame of Act 219 of Civil Law

Author(s)

AHANGARAN MOHAMMAD RASOOL | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

LicenseQ2

necessityQ2

contractQ2

hipocricyQ2

doubt in subjectQ2

conditional sentenceQ1

Abstract

when there is a doubt between License and necessity in a contract, necessity is regarded as the basis; that is, no party is able to nullify contract without satisfaction of the other party. Through this principle, conditional sentence of of necessity is active for all contracts, unless some specific points in which for reasonable cause, conditional sentence of License is proved. Jurisprudents ans Islamic lawyers rely upon some reasons such as Quranic verses, traditions, method of thinkers and practical assiciation with someone to prove this principle. Accordingly, in act 219 of Civil Law for all contracts, and in act 457 for bidding contracts, necessity is sentenced; however, due to doubt in subject and hypocricy, its dimensioms are not clear; however, it will be clear through juridical reasons. According to this verse that says, “ accomplish your contracts” and the method of thinkers, sentence to necessity in hypocricy is proved. But sentence to necessity in doubt in subject is capable through practical principle of associating someone. As a result, based on the justification of each reason, the dimension of necessity in both doubts becomes evident.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AHANGARAN, MOHAMMAD RASOOL. (2019). A Survey of Jurisprudential Principles of Necessity in Contracts to Evaluate Religious Frame of Act 219 of Civil Law. ISLAMIC LAW RESEARCH JOURNAL, 19(2 (48) ), 301-318. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/229387/en

Vancouver: Copy

AHANGARAN MOHAMMAD RASOOL. A Survey of Jurisprudential Principles of Necessity in Contracts to Evaluate Religious Frame of Act 219 of Civil Law. ISLAMIC LAW RESEARCH JOURNAL[Internet]. 2019;19(2 (48) ):301-318. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/229387/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD RASOOL AHANGARAN, “A Survey of Jurisprudential Principles of Necessity in Contracts to Evaluate Religious Frame of Act 219 of Civil Law,” ISLAMIC LAW RESEARCH JOURNAL, vol. 19, no. 2 (48) , pp. 301–318, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/229387/en

Related Journal Papers