EFFICIENCY OF REASON IN EVALUATING THE ETHICAL STATEMENTS (UNDERSTANDING THE ORIGIN OF RATIONAL GOOD AND BADNESS)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

RAHIMIAN MOHAMMAD; RAHIMIAN ALIREZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL RESEARCH (AFAGHE HEKMAT) Year:2015 | Volume:3 | Issue:8 Page(s): 89-107

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,063

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EFFICIENCY OF REASON IN EVALUATING THE ETHICAL STATEMENTS (UNDERSTANDING THE ORIGIN OF RATIONAL GOOD AND BADNESS)

Author(s)

RAHIMIAN MOHAMMAD | RAHIMIAN ALIREZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

RATIONAL ESSENTIAL GOOD AND BADNESSQ2

GOOD OF JUSTICEQ2

BADNESS OF INJUSTICEQ2

GOOD OF TRUTHQ2

BADNESS OF FALSEQ2

Abstract

The present paper intends to give a new analytical about the views of Shi’a scholars on the issue of rational good and badness. Adliah (including Shi’a and Mu’tazila) unlike the Ash’arites of Sunni Orthodoxy, believe in essential good and badness. The dispute has an epistemological origin. The root of the dispute lies in accepting the judgment by reason in the scope of ethical tasks on the side of Adliah, and removal of reason from such aspect by Ash’arites. After accepting the view of Adliah, some disagreements are observed in explaining its details which display themselves in the way of answering to the difficulties raised by Ash’arites. Some Shi’a scholars are maintaining essential good and badness for acts like truth and false. Some other group have related good and badness of such actions to their being useful or harmful. The third view is that the good and badness of actions are, after comparing them with justice and injustice, considerable, and indeed, the GOOD OF JUSTICE and the BADNESS OF INJUSTICE, is the root of good and badness of various actions. In this paper, after stating these three views and their evidences, the third view is adopted as the free-willed opinion.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

RAHIMIAN, MOHAMMAD, & RAHIMIAN, ALIREZA. (2015). EFFICIENCY OF REASON IN EVALUATING THE ETHICAL STATEMENTS (UNDERSTANDING THE ORIGIN OF RATIONAL GOOD AND BADNESS). THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL RESEARCH (AFAGHE HEKMAT), 3(8), 89-107. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/232732/en

Vancouver: Copy

RAHIMIAN MOHAMMAD, RAHIMIAN ALIREZA. EFFICIENCY OF REASON IN EVALUATING THE ETHICAL STATEMENTS (UNDERSTANDING THE ORIGIN OF RATIONAL GOOD AND BADNESS). THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL RESEARCH (AFAGHE HEKMAT)[Internet]. 2015;3(8):89-107. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/232732/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD RAHIMIAN, and ALIREZA RAHIMIAN, “EFFICIENCY OF REASON IN EVALUATING THE ETHICAL STATEMENTS (UNDERSTANDING THE ORIGIN OF RATIONAL GOOD AND BADNESS),” THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL RESEARCH (AFAGHE HEKMAT), vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 89–107, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/232732/en

Related Journal Papers