EFFECTS OF NEUROFEEDBACK TRAINING ON PERFORMANCE IN NOVICE ARCHERS: DOUBLE BLIND STUDY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ESKANDARNEJAD M.; ABDOLI B.; NAZARI M.A.; VAEZ MOUSAVI S.M.K.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: MOTOR BEHAVIOR (RESEARCH ON SPORT SCIENCE) Year:2010 | Volume:2 | Issue:5 Page(s): 57-73

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,068

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EFFECTS OF NEUROFEEDBACK TRAINING ON PERFORMANCE IN NOVICE ARCHERS: DOUBLE BLIND STUDY

Author(s)

ESKANDARNEJAD M. | ABDOLI B. | NAZARI M.A. | VAEZ MOUSAVI S.M.K. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

NEUROFEEDBACKQ1

SHAM NEUROFEEDBACKQ3

EEG BIOFEEDBACKQ3

ARCHERYQ3

Abstract

The present study aimed at investigating changes in ARCHERY learning by NEUROFEEDBACK training in novice archers. The sample was composed of 45 non-athletes, right handed, women, between 19-24 years, undergraduate university students who volunteered to participate in the study. Subjects were randomly assigned to three groups: group 1 received real NEUROFEEDBACK; group2 received sham NEUROFEEDBACK and group 3 as a control group (without receiving NEUROFEEDBACK). 45 participants took part in all experiment session. Before starting the experiment, all subjects participated in a pre-assessment session after two ARCHERY training sessions.The post-assessment session was similar to pre-assessment. All subjects participated in three sessions per week consisting ARCHERY training which lasted for two months. Thorough these sessions, group 1 received NEUROFEEDBACK training based on their brainwave activities and group 2 participated in NEUROFEEDBACK training in which providing feedbacks weren't based on their brainwave activities, control group just participated in ARCHERY training. Each NEUROFEEDBACK session lasted for thirty minutes. One-way ANCOVA showed significant differences between real NEUROFEEDBACK group and other groups (control and sham NEUROFEEDBACK group) (a<0.05). The finding suggests that NEUROFEEDBACK training improve ARCHERY records in the beginner archers.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ESKANDARNEJAD, M., ABDOLI, B., NAZARI, M.A., & VAEZ MOUSAVI, S.M.K.. (2010). EFFECTS OF NEUROFEEDBACK TRAINING ON PERFORMANCE IN NOVICE ARCHERS: DOUBLE BLIND STUDY. MOTOR BEHAVIOR (RESEARCH ON SPORT SCIENCE), 2(5), 57-73. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/232862/en

Vancouver: Copy

ESKANDARNEJAD M., ABDOLI B., NAZARI M.A., VAEZ MOUSAVI S.M.K.. EFFECTS OF NEUROFEEDBACK TRAINING ON PERFORMANCE IN NOVICE ARCHERS: DOUBLE BLIND STUDY. MOTOR BEHAVIOR (RESEARCH ON SPORT SCIENCE)[Internet]. 2010;2(5):57-73. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/232862/en

IEEE: Copy

M. ESKANDARNEJAD, B. ABDOLI, M.A. NAZARI, and S.M.K. VAEZ MOUSAVI, “EFFECTS OF NEUROFEEDBACK TRAINING ON PERFORMANCE IN NOVICE ARCHERS: DOUBLE BLIND STUDY,” MOTOR BEHAVIOR (RESEARCH ON SPORT SCIENCE), vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 57–73, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/232862/en

Related Journal Papers