مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

584
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Understanding and Assessing the Book of Modern Political Analysis: Innovations and Dilemmas

Pages

  111-132

Abstract

 The purpose of this paper is, in particular, to understand and evaluate Robert Dahl and Brackner's book, modern Political Analysis and in general, to provide a framework for analyzing a text. Today, the conventional way of examining a text with false assumptions, which actually lead to a lack of Understanding and Evaluation, is to presuppose definitions of Understanding and Evaluation, attention to semantic dimensions, and emphasis on face and content Evaluation. But, is it really possible to evaluate without Understanding the work? The main reasoning behind this article is that the conditions for the possibility of Understanding and evaluating a piece of work, based on this assumption, are that Understanding and Evaluation are inextricably bound. The context of Understanding requires the return of the text to the historical context and the context of the Evaluation involves the propositional content. The result of the application of this interconnectedness is that the work has been written in the political atmosphere of "democracy" and "behaviorist" science. The verbs contained in the speech initially confirm the behavioral-oriented monistic methodology, then change into pluralistic affiliation. An increasing propositional content represents Innovation in the thematic, political, and methodological context. Decreasing propositional content points to problems in the methodological domain of political sciences. For example, it is not able to provide a valid argument about how to obtain normative propositions from the empirical methods of studying the historical and metaphysical values. Therefore, the Understanding and appraisal of political phenomena require Robert Dahl's methodological adjustments.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    ABDOLAHPOUR CHENARI, MOHAMMAD. (2019). Understanding and Assessing the Book of Modern Political Analysis: Innovations and Dilemmas. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES, 18(12 (64) ), 111-132. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/235130/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    ABDOLAHPOUR CHENARI MOHAMMAD. Understanding and Assessing the Book of Modern Political Analysis: Innovations and Dilemmas. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES[Internet]. 2019;18(12 (64) ):111-132. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/235130/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MOHAMMAD ABDOLAHPOUR CHENARI, “Understanding and Assessing the Book of Modern Political Analysis: Innovations and Dilemmas,” JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES, vol. 18, no. 12 (64) , pp. 111–132, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/235130/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button