مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

365
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Review for the Reviewer’ s Review Pathology of Book Review: « L’ Histoire de la Litté rature franç aise du XIXe siè cle », SAMT Publication, Institute of Humanities

Pages

  115-134

Abstract

 Regarding the book review of « L’ Histoire de la Litté rature franç aise du XIXe siè cle », written by Mrs Mitra Rayissi (PhD), from SAMT Publications which appears to be more a Bad Derivative Review than a book review, the authors of the book have decided to write this article intending to shed light on the improper critiques in academia with the purpose that eventually such critiques will be replaced with more scientifically written articles. In this paper, with precise focus on reasoning, the review of the critic is analyzed to depict how, considering the book’ s limited number of readers and its medium, the comparison between this book and internationally acclaimed resource books which are published by international publishers cannot be a just comparison. Furthermore, why has the significant role of the publisher, regarding the review process and editing, been disregarded and rather authors are denounced for this issue? The current paper, undoubtedly, has not been written to defend the inefficiency of academic books in our country; the sole objective is to tackle the phenomenon of Bad Derivative Review which is detrimental to the current situation of academia in the country.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    LETAFATI, ROYA, & Moazzami, Bita. (2018). Review for the Reviewer’ s Review Pathology of Book Review: « L’ Histoire de la Litté rature franç aise du XIXe siè cle », SAMT Publication, Institute of Humanities. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES, 18(3 ), 115-134. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/235339/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    LETAFATI ROYA, Moazzami Bita. Review for the Reviewer’ s Review Pathology of Book Review: « L’ Histoire de la Litté rature franç aise du XIXe siè cle », SAMT Publication, Institute of Humanities. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES[Internet]. 2018;18(3 ):115-134. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/235339/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ROYA LETAFATI, and Bita Moazzami, “Review for the Reviewer’ s Review Pathology of Book Review: « L’ Histoire de la Litté rature franç aise du XIXe siè cle », SAMT Publication, Institute of Humanities,” JOURNAL OF CRITICAL LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES, vol. 18, no. 3 , pp. 115–134, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/235339/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button