THE POSSIBILITY OF HAVING RELIGIOUS SCIENCE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

RAJABI MAHMUD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: MARIFAT I FARHANGI AND EJTEMAII Year:2011 | Volume:2 | Issue:4 (8) Page(s): 5-28

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

947

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE POSSIBILITY OF HAVING RELIGIOUS SCIENCE

Author(s)

RAJABI MAHMUD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

RELIGIOUS SCIENCEQ2

THE EVIDENCE OF PROPONENTS OF RELIGIOUS SCIENCEQ2

DISTINCTION BETWEEN SCIENCESQ3

PRECEDENT OF RELIGIOUS SCIENCEQ2

Abstract

RELIGIOUS SCIENCE has different dimensions, domains, principles, definitions, presuppositions, and representations. Those who hold that it is not possible to have RELIGIOUS SCIENCE cite such precedent reasons like: ideologizing science has an unsuccessful background; discussion about RELIGIOUS SCIENCE is abrogated; RELIGIOUS SCIENCE lacks scientific and political support; defending RELIGIOUS SCIENCE is emotional; there is a disparity between what ‘is’ and what ‘ought to be’, every science has unity in subject matter and method; the accidental nature of science; the term "RELIGIOUS SCIENCE" is paradoxical, and its implications are unacceptable.The reasons stated above cannot establish the claim that it is impossible to have RELIGIOUS SCIENCE because ideologizing science in Christianity and Marxism cannot be considered as evidence for inefficiency of RELIGIOUS SCIENCE. This illusion arises from the incorrect presupposition that Islam is identical to other religions. Other aforementioned reasons such as abrogation of RELIGIOUS SCIENCE, accidental nature of science, disparity between what ‘is’ and what ‘ought to be’, and lack of scientific support for RELIGIOUS SCIENCE are unfounded claims which do not correspond to the facts of the history of science. The conclusion that the unity of subject matter and method of RELIGIOUS SCIENCE is incorrect and that the term "RELIGIOUS SCIENCE" is paradoxical are a sort of fallacy. Finally, the idea that the implications of RELIGIOUS SCIENCE are unacceptable is a mere claim which has to do with the realization of RELIGIOUS SCIENCE and resulting from the unfamiliarity with Islamic sciences and domain of the doctrines of Islam.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

RAJABI, MAHMUD. (2011). THE POSSIBILITY OF HAVING RELIGIOUS SCIENCE. MARIFAT I FARHANGI AND EJTEMAII, 2(4 (8)), 5-28. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/235415/en

Vancouver: Copy

RAJABI MAHMUD. THE POSSIBILITY OF HAVING RELIGIOUS SCIENCE. MARIFAT I FARHANGI AND EJTEMAII[Internet]. 2011;2(4 (8)):5-28. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/235415/en

IEEE: Copy

MAHMUD RAJABI, “THE POSSIBILITY OF HAVING RELIGIOUS SCIENCE,” MARIFAT I FARHANGI AND EJTEMAII, vol. 2, no. 4 (8), pp. 5–28, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/235415/en

Related Journal Papers