DEFENDING THE SOCIALLY EXTENDED NOTION OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

YAGHMAIE ABOO TORAB

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: KNOWLEDGE STUDIES IN THE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY Year:2015 | Volume:19 | Issue:2 (63) Page(s): 199-212

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

805

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

DEFENDING THE SOCIALLY EXTENDED NOTION OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE

Author(s)

YAGHMAIE ABOO TORAB | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SOCIAL KNOWLEDGEQ2

SOCIALLY EXTENDED SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGEQ2

SUMMATIVE ACCOUNT OF SOCIALQ2

Abstract

Objectives: Alexander Bird has recently argued that social scientific knowledge is not reduced to individual scientific knowledge, nor supervenes on any mental state. Jenifer Lackey has raised two objections against Bird’s account of SOCIAL KNOWLEDGE. According to the first, Bird’s proposal contradicts with the conjunction of two accepted principles in epistemology named Knowledge/Action and Group/Member Action Principles. According to the second objection, Bird’s account does not accommodate defeating social scientific knowledge. The present article intends to answer Lackey’s objections.Method: Conceptual analysis together with respecting intuitions about scientific knowledge. Results: A principle replaced with the accepted principles will be introduced which respects the socially extended notion of scientific knowledge. I call it Group/Member Knowledge/Action Principle. Secondly, I will indicate that the SOCIALLY EXTENDED SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE, although rarely, is defeated. Conclusion: The author of the survey concludes Bird’s account of social scientific knowledge is consistent with the principles accepted in epistemology horizontal relationships.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

YAGHMAIE, ABOO TORAB. (2015). DEFENDING THE SOCIALLY EXTENDED NOTION OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE. KNOWLEDGE STUDIES IN THE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY, 19(2 (63)), 199-212. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/237025/en

Vancouver: Copy

YAGHMAIE ABOO TORAB. DEFENDING THE SOCIALLY EXTENDED NOTION OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE. KNOWLEDGE STUDIES IN THE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY[Internet]. 2015;19(2 (63)):199-212. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/237025/en

IEEE: Copy

ABOO TORAB YAGHMAIE, “DEFENDING THE SOCIALLY EXTENDED NOTION OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE,” KNOWLEDGE STUDIES IN THE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY, vol. 19, no. 2 (63), pp. 199–212, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/237025/en

Related Journal Papers