مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,003
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Validation Role of Multiple-Methods in Management Accounting Research: with Emphasis on Triangulation between Case Studies and Surveys

Author(s)

KHAJAVI SHOKROLLAH | Etemadi Eidgahi Sara | GHADIRIAN ARANI MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN | Issue Writer Certificate 

Pages

  95-116

Abstract

 One way to increase the validity of empirical research in management accounting is to combine qualitative and quantitative methods in the pragmatist and positivist paradigms. Applying Triangulation approach prevents the incomplete, superficial and simplistic explanations, and increases the validity of the research. The purpose of this study is a comparative review of Management accounting research which is done by applying Triangulation between case studies and surveys. This study is a qualitative research that uses an archival data collection approach. Our findings demonstrate that various qualitative and quantitative methods, such as theory-testing and theory development approaches require specific internal and external validation since each of these methods might result in inconclusive and incomplete results when used alone. Therefore, trying in combining elements of these approaches in a more balanced way with coherent research programs improve validation efforts. Findings, also show that not only using of Triangulation between case studies and surveys methods in Iranian management accounting studies is rare, but also validation of them is not considered

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    KHAJAVI, SHOKROLLAH, Etemadi Eidgahi, Sara, & GHADIRIAN ARANI, MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN. (2017). Validation Role of Multiple-Methods in Management Accounting Research: with Emphasis on Triangulation between Case Studies and Surveys. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING KNOWLEDGE AND MANAGEMENT AUDITING, 6(23 ), 95-116. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/238125/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    KHAJAVI SHOKROLLAH, Etemadi Eidgahi Sara, GHADIRIAN ARANI MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN. Validation Role of Multiple-Methods in Management Accounting Research: with Emphasis on Triangulation between Case Studies and Surveys. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING KNOWLEDGE AND MANAGEMENT AUDITING[Internet]. 2017;6(23 ):95-116. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/238125/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SHOKROLLAH KHAJAVI, Sara Etemadi Eidgahi, and MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN GHADIRIAN ARANI, “Validation Role of Multiple-Methods in Management Accounting Research: with Emphasis on Triangulation between Case Studies and Surveys,” JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING KNOWLEDGE AND MANAGEMENT AUDITING, vol. 6, no. 23 , pp. 95–116, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/238125/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top