THE THEORY OF THE ASSESSABILITY OF THE MYSTIC PROPOSITIONS WITH A CRITIQUE OF THREE RIVAL THEORIES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

FAZLI ALI

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: ASRA HIKMAT Year:2014 | Volume:6 | Issue:1 (19) Page(s): 107-130

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

770

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE THEORY OF THE ASSESSABILITY OF THE MYSTIC PROPOSITIONS WITH A CRITIQUE OF THREE RIVAL THEORIES

Author(s)

FAZLI ALI | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ASSESSABLITYQ2

INFALLIBILITYQ2

INASSESSABILITYQ2

INDESCRIBABILITYQ2

Abstract

One of the branches of the philosophy of mysticism is the philosophy of theoretical mysticism, and among the issues discussed in the philosophy of theoretical mysticism arethe logics and the criterion for the theoretical mysticism. Such a logic is based on the assessability of the mystic propositions, which is based on the statements "there is a criterion for all knowledge" and "there is a criterion for all rulings" so as to pave the way for the criticism and the assessment of the propositions so as to realize their validity or invalidity. However, there are three rival theories for the assessability theory, i.e. the INFALLIBILITY, INASSESSABILITY, and INDESCRIBABILITY theories. The INFALLIBILITY theory emphasizes the INFALLIBILITY of the mystic affectivities, the INASSESSABILITY theory stresses the incomprehensibility and the INDESCRIBABILITY theory emphasizes the meaningfulness, illogicality, and the realism and the meaninglessness of the mystic propositions. These three theories consider the assessability of the mystic propositions impossible, the foundations of the logics of the theoretical mysticism poor, and the validity of the assessments for the verification of the mystic propositions under question. Accordingly, the present research aims at demonstrating the possibility of assessability and criticizing these three rival theories so as to consolidate the foundations of the logics behind the theoretical mysticism.

Cites

No record.

References

نقد عقل به عقل

Cite

APA: Copy

FAZLI, ALI. (2014). THE THEORY OF THE ASSESSABILITY OF THE MYSTIC PROPOSITIONS WITH A CRITIQUE OF THREE RIVAL THEORIES. ASRA HIKMAT, 6(1 (19)), 107-130. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/240583/en

Vancouver: Copy

FAZLI ALI. THE THEORY OF THE ASSESSABILITY OF THE MYSTIC PROPOSITIONS WITH A CRITIQUE OF THREE RIVAL THEORIES. ASRA HIKMAT[Internet]. 2014;6(1 (19)):107-130. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/240583/en

IEEE: Copy

ALI FAZLI, “THE THEORY OF THE ASSESSABILITY OF THE MYSTIC PROPOSITIONS WITH A CRITIQUE OF THREE RIVAL THEORIES,” ASRA HIKMAT, vol. 6, no. 1 (19), pp. 107–130, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/240583/en

Related Journal Papers