INVESTIGATING THE RECIPROCAL IMPACT OF LAW AND ETHICS IN THE STRUCTURE OF MONOTHEISTIC SOCIALISM AND ITS CRITIQUE IN THE DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

JAFARZADEH YOUSSEF

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: KHODAY NAMEH (THEOLOGUE) Year:2012 | Volume:1 | Issue:1 Page(s): 25-40

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

948

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

INVESTIGATING THE RECIPROCAL IMPACT OF LAW AND ETHICS IN THE STRUCTURE OF MONOTHEISTIC SOCIALISM AND ITS CRITIQUE IN THE DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Author(s)

JAFARZADEH YOUSSEF | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

MONOTHEISMQ2

THIRD ZONE OF HUMAN ATTRIBUTIONQ2

LAWSQ3

ETHICSQ3

MUTUAL IMPACTQ2

THE DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTSQ2

Abstract

In the deep structure of monotheistic socialism, law and ETHICS do belong to the attributive, and not substantive, spheres of human existence. Although human individuals constitute the natural core of this attribution and share with it a “hermeneutic circuit”, legal and ethical dictates such as “I” and “Other” transcend into “the THIRD ZONE OF HUMAN ATTRIBUTION”. Though situated in the same setting, law and ETHICS differ in quality and kind. ETHICS enjoys a more intrinsic and exalted state. Yet both augment each other’s dimensions within a hermeneutic circuit, or else, they confine these dimensions; a communicative mode termed as “Mutual Impact”. As for its positive aspect, when justice and legal freedoms prevail the ground is paved for ethical freedom and justice as well. Accordingly, with the expansion of domain of ETHICS, lawfulness also pervades which in turn reduces crimes and promotes general order. As for its negative, if LAWS cannot culminate in human transcendence, spread of unethical relations would let legal relations corrode.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

JAFARZADEH, YOUSSEF. (2012). INVESTIGATING THE RECIPROCAL IMPACT OF LAW AND ETHICS IN THE STRUCTURE OF MONOTHEISTIC SOCIALISM AND ITS CRITIQUE IN THE DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS. KHODAY NAMEH (THEOLOGUE), 1(1), 25-40. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/241570/en

Vancouver: Copy

JAFARZADEH YOUSSEF. INVESTIGATING THE RECIPROCAL IMPACT OF LAW AND ETHICS IN THE STRUCTURE OF MONOTHEISTIC SOCIALISM AND ITS CRITIQUE IN THE DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS. KHODAY NAMEH (THEOLOGUE)[Internet]. 2012;1(1):25-40. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/241570/en

IEEE: Copy

YOUSSEF JAFARZADEH, “INVESTIGATING THE RECIPROCAL IMPACT OF LAW AND ETHICS IN THE STRUCTURE OF MONOTHEISTIC SOCIALISM AND ITS CRITIQUE IN THE DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS,” KHODAY NAMEH (THEOLOGUE), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25–40, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/241570/en

Related Journal Papers