REVIEW ON POSITIONS OF OPPONENTS AND PROPONENTS OF CAUSAL NECESSITY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

REZAEI HASSAN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: AIN E HIKMAT Year:2013 | Volume:5 | Issue:15 Page(s): 7-35

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

780

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

REVIEW ON POSITIONS OF OPPONENTS AND PROPONENTS OF CAUSAL NECESSITY

Author(s)

REZAEI HASSAN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CAUSAL NECESSITYQ2

PRIOR NECESSITYQ1

NECESSITY BY COMPARISONQ2

WILLQ2

FREE AGENTQ2

FREEDOM OF GODQ2

Abstract

CAUSAL NECESSITY has always been one of the important and controversial problems of philosophy among thinkers. Ibn Sina as outstanding Peripatetic philosopher holds the cause-effect relation to be necessary. Although he regards such relationship to be self-evident, he offered some arguments in its support. Theologians, experts in methodology of fiqh as well as some contemporary scholars are against this view. Arguing that arguments presented by Ibn Sina and other proponents of the rule as question- begging, they maintain that acceptance of this rule is incompatibility with freedom in God and human and thus rule they reject the truth of the rule. It seems that the rule is self-evident and denial of it is to deny the very principle of causality and acceptance of the theory of chance. On reflection, one can realize that there is no incompatibility between freedom and causality and any denial of such relation entails theory of chance according to which one can certainly deny the attribution of an action to the agent.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

REZAEI, HASSAN. (2013). REVIEW ON POSITIONS OF OPPONENTS AND PROPONENTS OF CAUSAL NECESSITY. AIN E HIKMAT, 5(15), 7-35. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/244554/en

Vancouver: Copy

REZAEI HASSAN. REVIEW ON POSITIONS OF OPPONENTS AND PROPONENTS OF CAUSAL NECESSITY. AIN E HIKMAT[Internet]. 2013;5(15):7-35. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/244554/en

IEEE: Copy

HASSAN REZAEI, “REVIEW ON POSITIONS OF OPPONENTS AND PROPONENTS OF CAUSAL NECESSITY,” AIN E HIKMAT, vol. 5, no. 15, pp. 7–35, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/244554/en

Related Journal Papers