THE COMPARISON BETWEEN SUPERVISORY BODIES OF HUMAN RIGHTS INTERPRETATIONS AND INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURTS JUDGMENTS ON PROVISIONAL RELEASE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

TAGHIPOUR ALIREZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: COMPARATIVE LAW REVIEW Year:2017 | Volume:7 | Issue:2 Page(s): 493-510

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

776

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE COMPARISON BETWEEN SUPERVISORY BODIES OF HUMAN RIGHTS INTERPRETATIONS AND INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURTS JUDGMENTS ON PROVISIONAL RELEASE

Author(s)

TAGHIPOUR ALIREZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURTSQ1

INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTSQ1

PROVISIONAL RELEASEQ1

RIGHTS OF ACCUSEDQ2

SUPERVISORY BODIES OF HUMAN RIGHTSQ2

Abstract

Nuremberg and Tokyo courts were the first INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURTS were established by allies when there were no international regulations regarding the accused rights. But after World War II, effective steps were taken in this regard. At global and regional levels, a large number of documents have fully noted this matter and also measures such as the Human Rights Committee of the United Nations and the European Court of Human Rights have been predicted to be executed. The organs that played a significant role by interpreting the rights of the accused. PROVISIONAL RELEASE is considered as one among these rights. After that in the late twentieth century and early twenty-first century, other courts were established at the international level. Now the question that arises in this context is whether these courts are required to follow the interpretations provided by the Human Rights Watch organization or not? Given that the rights of the accused do not differ in national courts and international criminal tribunals institutions, Human Rights Watch institutions throughout years have interpreted the provisions relating to the rights of the accused in their case law, Therefore, interpretations of the INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURTS judges can‘t be inconsistent also with the judicial procedures. However, the rules and the interpretations of the courts of the latter led to violation of the rights of the accused in PROVISIONAL RELEASE. In the present article, the interpretations offered by human rights monitoring bodies have been investigated with the views of INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURTS in this area.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

TAGHIPOUR, ALIREZA. (2017). THE COMPARISON BETWEEN SUPERVISORY BODIES OF HUMAN RIGHTS INTERPRETATIONS AND INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURTS JUDGMENTS ON PROVISIONAL RELEASE. COMPARATIVE LAW REVIEW, 7(2 ), 493-510. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/246340/en

Vancouver: Copy

TAGHIPOUR ALIREZA. THE COMPARISON BETWEEN SUPERVISORY BODIES OF HUMAN RIGHTS INTERPRETATIONS AND INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURTS JUDGMENTS ON PROVISIONAL RELEASE. COMPARATIVE LAW REVIEW[Internet]. 2017;7(2 ):493-510. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/246340/en

IEEE: Copy

ALIREZA TAGHIPOUR, “THE COMPARISON BETWEEN SUPERVISORY BODIES OF HUMAN RIGHTS INTERPRETATIONS AND INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURTS JUDGMENTS ON PROVISIONAL RELEASE,” COMPARATIVE LAW REVIEW, vol. 7, no. 2 , pp. 493–510, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/246340/en

Related Journal Papers